Competitive and non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists fail to prevent the induction of methamphetamine-induced sensitization.

In order to elucidate the possible roles of the glutamate system in the mechanisms underlying behavioral sensitization, which is used as an animal model for human psychosis, we investigated the effects of 3-((+/-)-2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP) and MK-801 ((+)-dizocilpine), a competitive and noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, respectively, on methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization in rats. Administration of 0.5 mg/kg MK-801 enhanced 2 mg/kg methamphetamine-induced hyperactivity, whereas it reduced 6 mg/kg methamphetamine-induced stereotyped behavior markedly. CPP (10 mg/kg) reduced 2 mg/kg methamphetamine-induced stereotypy slightly. Repeated treatment with 2 and 6 mg/kg methamphetamine alone induced progressive augmentation of stereotypy, whereas combining either MK-801 or CPP with methamphetamine treatment abolished or attenuated this augmentation. However, when rats were challenged with methamphetamine after a 7-day period of abstinence, the intensity of stereotypy among the rats pretreated with repeated doses of methamphetamine alone or in combination with MK-801 or CPP did not differ significantly. These results indicate that competitive and non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonists modulate acute methamphetamine-induced abnormal behavior and sensitization expression, but they failed to prevent the induction of the neural mechanisms underlying behavioral sensitization.