首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Accounting for overfishing in life cycle assessment: new impact categories for biotic resource use
Authors:Andreas Emanuelsson  Friederike Ziegler  Leif Pihl  Mattias Sköld  Ulf Sonesson
Institution:1. Department of Sustainable Food Production, SIK—The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, 402 29, Gothenburg, Sweden
2. Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 451 78, Fiskebackskil, Sweden
3. Department of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Marine Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 453 30, Lysekil, Sweden
Abstract:

Purpose

Overfishing is a relevant issue to include in all life cycle assessments (LCAs) involving wild caught fish, as overfishing of fish stocks clearly targets the LCA safeguard objects of natural resources and natural ecosystems. Yet no robust method for assessing overfishing has been available. We propose lost potential yield (LPY) as a midpoint impact category to quantify overfishing, comparing the outcome of current with target fisheries management. This category primarily reflects the impact on biotic resource availability, but also serves as a proxy for ecosystem impacts within each stock.

Methods

LPY represents average lost catches owing to ongoing overfishing, assessed by simplified biomass projections covering different fishing mortality scenarios. It is based on the maximum sustainable yield concept and complemented by two alternative methods, overfishing though fishing mortality (OF) and overfishedness of biomass (OB), that are less data-demanding.

Results and discussion

Characterization factors are provided for 31 European commercial fish stocks in 2010, representing 74 % of European and 7 % of global landings. However, large spatial and temporal variations were observed, requiring novel approaches for the LCA practitioner. The methodology is considered compliant with the International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) standard in most relevant aspects, although harmonization through normalization and endpoint characterization is only briefly discussed.

Conclusions

Seafood LCAs including any of the three approaches can be a powerful communicative tool for the food industry, seafood certification programmes, and for fisheries management.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号