Functional implications of variation in pectoral fin ray morphology between fishes with different patterns of pectoral fin use

In this study, I compare the morphology from the pectoral fin rays from the benthic longhorn sculpin (Myoxocephalus octodecimspinosus) to those from a species that does not use its fins for substrate contact, the yellow perch (Perca flavescens). I use CT scanning technology to compare the shape and structure of the paired hemitrichia that make up the pectoral fin rays between these species. I found that the structure of hemitrichia of the fin rays in yellow perch is consistent with previous descriptions for pelagic fishes. They are almost completely segmented, have a crescent shape in cross section, and are branched distally. In contrast, longhorn sculpin hemitrichia exhibit morphological regionalization along the proximo‐distal length of the ray. The most proximal 20–50% of the length of the hemitrichia is unsegmented and cylindrical in cross section. Distally, the fin rays of longhorn sculpin are segmented and crescent‐shaped but do not branch. I measured the second moment of area of the hemitrichia at distances of 10%, 30%, 50%, and 70% distance along the length of the fin rays. The cylindrical regions of the sculpin hemitrichia had a higher second moment of area than the crescent‐shaped regions in either species. I hypothesize that that this regionalization of individual fin rays provides resistance to bending proximally and flexibility distally, features that may be useful during substrate contact. This combination of an elongate, unsegmented proximal region and segmented distal region in fin rays has not yet been described among extant ray‐finned fishes. However, this structure is reminiscent of that of the elongate cylindrical region found in the fossil sarcopterygian fish Eusthenopteron. J. Morphol. 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.