Cell-based studies reveal differences in glutathione S-transferase induction between oltipraz and tert-butylhydroquinone |
| |
Authors: | Lamb John G Franklin Michael R |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA. |
| |
Abstract: | Selective induction of Phase II over Phase I drug-metabolizing enzymes has been proposed as a mechanism for reduction of chemical carcinogenesis. Enzymes likely to play a role in this amelioration include the glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) and among compounds that selectively induce key GSTs are tert-butylhydroquinone (tBHQ) and oltipraz [4-methyl-5-(2-pyrazinyl)-3H-1,2-dithiole-3-thione]. In vivo, and in hepatoma cells (H4IIE), these two agents induce rat GSTA2 mRNA to a similar extent. However, with a luciferase reporter construct containing 1651 bp of the proximal 5' flanking region of the rGSTA2 gene in the same cell line and under similar conditions, luciferase activity was induced to a much greater extent by tBHQ than by oltipraz. A similar large intercompound differential was seen with reporter constructs containing either the rGSTA2 ARE enhancer and HNF1 site (-872 to -582) or XRE enhancer and HNF1 site (-1110 to -812). In H4IIE cells, the rGSTA2 mRNA response to each agent was completely inhibited by 1 microM actinomycin-D cotreatment. With 1 microM cycloheximide cotreatment however, some induction by tBHQ remained, while induction by oltipraz was completely abolished. The induction response to tBHQ but not oltipraz was augmented by pretreatment with PD98059, a MEK1/2 specific inhibitor. Notwithstanding induction characteristics in common, oltipraz, and tBHQ have sufficient dissimilarities to indicate that rGSTA2 upregulation by the two agents is not identical. |
| |
Keywords: | Glutathione S‐Transferase CYP1A1 Enzyme Induction Antioxidant Response Element Oltipraz Tert‐Butylhydroquinone |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|