首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


A critical comparison between two classical and a kit‐based method for mitochondria isolation
Authors:Sonja Hartwig  Christian Feckler  Stefan Lehr  Katrin Wallbrecht  Heike Wolgast  Dirk Müller‐Wieland  Jörg Kotzka
Institution:1. Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and Pathobiochemistry, German Diabetes Center at the Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research, Düsseldorf, Germany;2. Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany;3. Institute for Diabetes Research, Department of General Internal Medicine, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
Abstract:Numerous protocols for isolation of mitochondria are available. Here, three methods for the isolation of intact mitochondria from mouse liver tissues are compared with regard to yield, purity and activity. Mitochondria were isolated by sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation, free‐flow electrophoresis or a commercially available kit‐based method. Our analyses show that the sophisticated (and most expensive) free‐flow electrophoresis method enables isolation of intact mitochondria with an enrichment of approximately 70%. Using the classical density centrifugation method is very laborious and time‐consuming, but delivers about 57% intact mitochondria. Using standard laboratory equipment in a quick and simple procedure, the kit provides approximately 50% intact mitochondria, suitable for most standard investigations.
Keywords:2‐D gels  Mitochondria  Proteomics methods  Subcellular fractionation
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号