Influence of the H‐site residue 108 on human glutathione transferase P1‐1 ligand binding: Structure‐thermodynamic relationships and thermal stability |
| |
Authors: | Indalecio Quesada‐Soriano Lorien J. Parker Alessandra Primavera Juan M. Casas‐Solvas Antonio Vargas‐Berenguel Carmen Barón Craig J. Morton Anna Paola Mazzetti Mario Lo Bello Michael W. Parker Luis García‐Fuentes |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Almería, La Ca?ada de San Urbano, 04120 Almería, Spain;2. Indalecio Quesada‐Soriano and Lorien J. Parker contributed equally to this work.;3. Biota Structural Biology Laboratory, St. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia;4. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia;5. Department of Biology, University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” Via della Ricerca Scientifica, 00133 Rome, Italy;6. Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Almería, La Ca?ada de San Urbano, 04120 Almería, Spain |
| |
Abstract: | The effect of the Y108V mutation of human glutathione S‐transferase P1‐1 (hGST P1‐1) on the binding of the diuretic drug ethacrynic acid (EA) and its glutathione conjugate (EASG) was investigated by calorimetric, spectrofluorimetric, and crystallographic studies. The mutation Tyr 108 → Val resulted in a 3D‐structure very similar to the wild type (wt) enzyme, where both the hydrophobic ligand binding site (H‐site) and glutathione binding site (G‐site) are unchanged except for the mutation itself. However, due to a slight increase in the hydrophobicity of the H‐site, as a consequence of the mutation, an increase in the entropy was observed. The Y108V mutation does not affect the affinity of EASG for the enzyme, which has a higher affinity (Kd ~ 0.5 μM) when compared with those of the parent compounds, K ~ 13 μM, K ~ 25 μM. The EA moiety of the conjugate binds in the H‐site of Y108V mutant in a fashion completely different to those observed in the crystal structures of the EA or EASG wt complex structures. We further demonstrate that the ΔCp values of binding can also be correlated with the potential stacking interactions between ligand and residues located in the binding sites as predicted from crystal structures. Moreover, the mutation does not significantly affect the global stability of the enzyme. Our results demonstrate that calorimetric measurements maybe useful in determining the preference of binding (the binding mode) for a drug to a specific site of the enzyme, even in the absence of structural information. |
| |
Keywords: | glutathione S‐transferase ethacrynic acid calorimetry binding X‐ray crystallography EA‐conjugates thermal stability |
|
|