首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Differences between inhaled and intravenous bronchial challenge to detect O(3)-induced hyperresponsiveness.
Authors:B Sommer  M H Vargas  J Chavez  V Carbajal  P Segura  L M Monta?o
Institution:Departamento de Investigación en Asma, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Tlalpan 4502, CP 124080, México DF, México.
Abstract:Ozone (O(3))-induced airway hyperresponsiveness in laboratory animals is usually demonstrated through dose-response curves with inhaled or intravenous bronchoconstrictor agonists. However, comparability of these two routes has not been well documented. Thus guinea pig airway responsiveness to ACh and histamine was evaluated 16-18 h after O(3) (3 parts/million, 1 h) or air exposure by two plethysmographic methods (spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated) and by two administration routes (inhalatory or intravenous). We found that O(3) caused airway hyperresponsiveness to intravenous, but not to inhaled, agonists, independent of the plethysmographic method used. Suitability of the inhalatory route to detect airway hyperresponsiveness was corroborated with inhaled ACh after an antigen challenge or extending O(3) exposure to 3 h. Acetylcholinesterase activity was not modified after O(3) exposure in lung homogenates and blood samples. Thus inhaled agonists were less effective to reveal the airway hyperresponsiveness after an acute O(3) exposure than intravenous ones, at least for the 1-h exposure to 3 parts/million, and this difference seems not to be related to an O(3)-induced inhibition of the acetylcholinesterase activity.
Keywords:
点击此处可从《Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号