A field method of determining NH 4 + and NO 3 - uptake kinetics in intact roots: Effects of CO2 enrichment on trees and crop species

Models describing plant and ecosystem N cycles require an accurate assessment of root physiological uptake capacity for NH ₄ ⁺ and NO ₃ ^- under field conditions. Traditionally, rates of ion uptake in field-grown plants are determined by using excised root segments incubated for a short period in an assay solution containing N either as a radioactive or stable isotope tracer (e.g., ³⁶ClO₃ as a NH ₄ ⁺ analogue, ¹⁴CH₃NH₃ as an NO ₃ ^- analogue or ¹⁵NH ₄ ⁺ and ¹⁵NO ₃ ^- ). Although reliable, this method has several drawbacks. For example, in addition to radioactive safety issues, purchase and analysis of radioactive and stable isotopes is relatively expensive and can be a major limitation. More importantly, because excision effectively interrupts exchange of compounds between root and shoot (e.g., carbohydrate supply to root and N transport to shoot), the assay must be conducted quickly to avoid such complications. Here we present a novel field method for simultaneous measurements of NH ₄ ⁺ and NO ₃ ^- uptake kinetics in intact root systems. The application of this method is demonstrated using two tree species; red maple (Acer rubrum) and sugar maple (Acer saccharum) and two crop species soybean (Glycine max) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Plants were grown in open-top chambers at either ambient or elevated levels of atmospheric CO₂ at two separate US national sites involved in CO₂ research. Absolute values of net uptake rates and the kinetic parameters determined by our method were found to be in agreement with the literature reports. Roots of the crop species exhibited a greater uptake capacity for both N forms relative to tree species. Elevated CO₂ did not significantly affect kinetics of N uptake in species tested except in red maple where it increased root uptake capacity, V, for NH ₄ ⁺ . The application, reliability, advantages and disadvantages of the method are discussed in detail. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.