首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

IV型限制酶ScoMcrA中SRA结构域介导的二聚体化对硫结合结构域功能的影响机制
引用本文:杨炳旭,胡雯月,刘光,邓子新,贺新义. IV型限制酶ScoMcrA中SRA结构域介导的二聚体化对硫结合结构域功能的影响机制[J]. 微生物学通报, 2021, 48(10): 3543-3553
作者姓名:杨炳旭  胡雯月  刘光  邓子新  贺新义
作者单位:上海交通大学生命科学技术学院 微生物代谢国家重点实验室 上海 200030
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(31871250,31900060);上海市自然科学基金(20ZR1414500)
摘    要:[背景] 部分细菌的DNA骨架会发生磷硫酰化修饰,硫结合结构域(Sulfur Binding Domain,SBD)可以特异性识别这种生理修饰。与绝大多数SBD-HNH双结构域核酸酶不同,ScoMcrA的SBD和HNH结构域中间插入了一个特异性识别5-甲基胞嘧啶(5mC)修饰DNA的SET and RING-Associated (SRA)结构域。晶体结构显示,单独的SBD是单体,而SBD-SRA是双体。[目的] 探究ScoMcrA中SRA结构域的存在对SBD识别硫修饰DNA的影响及影响方式。[方法] 凝胶迁移实验(Electrophoresis Mobility Shift Assay,EMSA)比较SBD、SBD-SRA对硫修饰DNA结合力的差异;对参与SBD-SRA二聚体化的关键氨基酸残基突变,并检测点突变对SBD-SRA蛋白二聚体化及结合硫修饰DNA的影响。[结果] 相较于SBD结构域,SBD-SRA双结构域对磷硫酰化修饰DNA的结合能力明显增强。对SBD-SRA双体互作界面进行单点突变基本不影响其对硫修饰DNA的结合,当二聚体化界面连续的L261LGET265突变成A261AAAA265时,突变体对硫修饰DNA的结合力下降到与SBD相似的水平。[结论] 根据EMSA实验结果可以初步判断,SRA结构域介导的SBD-SRA双体化能增强SBD对硫修饰DNA的结合力;L261LGET265是SRA结构域上影响SBD对硫修饰DNA结合力的关键氨基酸位点。

关 键 词:磷硫酰化修饰  硫结合结构域  定点突变  凝胶迁移
收稿时间:2021-01-15

SET and RING-associated domain-mediated dimerization in type IV restriction enzyme ScoMcrA promotes the affinity of sulfur binding domain to sulfur modified DNA
YANG Bingxu,HU Wenyue,LIU Guang,DENG Zixin,HE Xinyi. SET and RING-associated domain-mediated dimerization in type IV restriction enzyme ScoMcrA promotes the affinity of sulfur binding domain to sulfur modified DNA[J]. Microbiology China, 2021, 48(10): 3543-3553
Authors:YANG Bingxu  HU Wenyue  LIU Guang  DENG Zixin  HE Xinyi
Affiliation:State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China
Abstract:[Background] Some bacterial DNA skeleton undergo phosphorothioate modification, sulfur binding domain (SBD) can specifically recognize this physiological modification. Unlike most SBD-HNH di-domain nucleases, SET and RING-associated (SRA) domain, specifically recognize DNA 5-methylcytosine (5mC), is inserted between SBD and HNH domains of ScoMcrA. The crystal structures show that single SBD is a monomer and SBD-SRA is a dimer.[Objective] The effects of the presence of SRA domain on the binding of sulfur modified DNA by SBD, and the way SRA domain affect the phosphorothioated DNA recognition. [Methods] Electrophoresis mobility shift assay (EMSA) was applied to compare binding affinity of SBD and SBD-SRA to sulfur modified DNA respectively. The key amino acid residues involved in dimerization of SBD-SRA were mutated to examine the binding affinity of mutant proteins to phosphorothioated DNA. [Results] Compared with SBD domain alone, the di-domain protein SBD-SRA showed enhanced affinity to sulfur modified DNA. The single point mutation of ten amino acid residues at the dimer-forming interface of SBD and SRA domain seldom affect its binding affinity to sulfur modified DNA. By comparison, L261LGET265 are simultaneously mutated to A261AAAA265 on SBD-SRA, the binding affinity of the mutant to sulfur modified DNA decreased to a level similar to that of SBD. [Conclusion] According to EMSA results, we primarily came to the conclusion that SRA domain can improve the binding ability of SBD to sulfur modified DNA in SBD-SRA di-domain protein; L261LGET265 is the key amino acid sites in the SRA domain that affects the binding ability of SBD to sulfur modified DNA.
Keywords:phosphorothioate modification  sulfur binding domain  site-directed mutagenesis  EMSA
点击此处可从《微生物学通报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《微生物学通报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号