首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Testing the optimal defence hypothesis for two indirect defences: extrafloral nectar and volatile organic compounds
Authors:Venkatesan Radhika  Christian Kost  Stefan Bartram  Martin Heil  Wilhelm Boland
Affiliation:1.Department of Bioorganic Chemistry,Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology,Jena,Germany;2.Evolutionary Genetics and Microbial Ecology Laboratory, New Zealand Institute for Advanced Study,Massey University,Auckland,New Zealand;3.Dept. de Ing. Genética,CINVESTAV, Irapuato. Km. 9.6 Libramiento Norte,Irapuato,México
Abstract:Many plants respond to herbivory with an increased production of extrafloral nectar (EFN) and/or volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to attract predatory arthropods as an indirect defensive strategy. In this study, we tested whether these two indirect defences fit the optimal defence hypothesis (ODH), which predicts the within-plant allocation of anti-herbivore defences according to trade-offs between growth and defence. Using jasmonic acid-induced plants of Phaseolus lunatus and Ricinus communis, we tested whether the within-plant distribution pattern of these two indirect defences reflects the fitness value of the respective plant parts. Furthermore, we quantified photosynthetic rates and followed the within-plant transport of assimilates with (13)C labelling experiments. EFN secretion and VOC emission were highest in younger leaves. Moreover, the photosynthetic rate increased with leaf age, and pulse-labelling experiments suggested transport of carbon to younger leaves. Our results demonstrate that the ODH can explain the within-plant allocation pattern of both indirect defences studied.
Keywords:Extrafloral nectar  Indirect defence  Ontogeny  Optimal defence hypothesis  Volatile organic compounds
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号