首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中华鳖非特异性免疫功能的群体差异研究
引用本文:刘至治,蔡完其,付立霞,黄玲璘.中华鳖非特异性免疫功能的群体差异研究[J].水生生物学报,2004,28(4):349-355.
作者姓名:刘至治  蔡完其  付立霞  黄玲璘
作者单位:农业部水产种质资源与养殖生态重点开放实验室,上海水产大学,上海,200090
基金项目:上海市水产办“中华鳖养殖业持续发展研究”项目 (科 0 0 95 )资助
摘    要:从补体总量、红细胞C3 b受体花环率、红细胞天然免疫肿瘤细胞花环率、T淋巴细胞活性E花环率及白细胞吞噬活性五方面 ,探讨了黄河鳖、淮河鳖、洞庭湖鳖、鄱阳湖鳖及太湖鳖在非特异性免疫功能上的差异。主要结果 :(1)在补体总量及红细胞天然免疫肿瘤细胞花环率上 ,五群体之间差异不显著 (F <0 .0 5 ) ;(2 )在红细胞C3 b受体花环率上 ,黄河鳖显著地高于鄱阳湖鳖与太湖鳖 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,而其余群体间则差异不显著 (F <0 .0 5 ) ,花环率大小顺序为 :黄河鳖 >淮河鳖 >洞庭湖鳖 >鄱阳湖鳖 >太湖鳖 ;(3)在T淋巴细胞活性E花环率上 ,黄河鳖显著高于鄱阳湖鳖 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,太湖鳖极显著地低于其他四个群体 (F >0 .0 1) ,其余群体间则差异不显著 (P >0 .0 5 ) ,花环率大小顺序为 :黄河鳖 >淮河鳖 >洞庭湖鳖 >鄱阳湖鳖 >太湖鳖 ;(4 )在白细胞吞噬活性上 ,除淮河鳖与鄱阳湖鳖差异不显著外 (P >0 .0 5 ) ,其余群体间则差异极显著 (F >0 .0 1) ,活性大小顺序为 :黄河鳖 >洞庭湖鳖 >淮河鳖 >鄱阳湖鳖 >太湖鳖。综上所述 ,在非特异性免疫功能上 ,黄河鳖最强 ,太湖鳖较弱。

关 键 词:中华鳖  黄河鳖  淮河鳖  洞庭湖鳖  鄱阳湖鳖  太湖鳖  非特异性免疫
文章编号:1000-3207(2004)04-0349-07
修稿时间:2003年1月6日

A STUDY ON THE VARIATION OF NON-SPECIFIC IMMUNE FUNCTIONS AMONG POPULATIONS OF SOFT-SHELLED TURTLE TRIONYX SINENSIS
LIU Zhi-Zhi,CAI Wan-Qi,FU Li-Xia,and HUANG Lin-Lin.A STUDY ON THE VARIATION OF NON-SPECIFIC IMMUNE FUNCTIONS AMONG POPULATIONS OF SOFT-SHELLED TURTLE TRIONYX SINENSIS[J].Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica,2004,28(4):349-355.
Authors:LIU Zhi-Zhi  CAI Wan-Qi  FU Li-Xia  and HUANG Lin-Lin
Abstract:The non-specific immune functions were studied among five populations of soft-shelled turtle from Yellow River,Huai River,Dongting Lake,Poyang Lake and Taihu Lake from five aspects--1) the total amount of complement, 2) the percentage of erythrocyte C 3b receptor rosette, 3) the percentage of erythrocyte native immune adhering tumor cell rosette, 4)the percentage of erythrocyte active rosette(EaR)of T lymphocyte and 5)the activity of leukocyte phagocyte The major results were:(1) There were no significant difference on the total amount of complement and the percentage of erythrocyte native immune adhering tumor cell rosette among the five populations of soft-shelled turtle (F<0.05).(2) On the percentage of erythrocyte C 3b receptor rosette,Yellow River population was significantly higher than that of Poyang Lake population and Taihu Lake population(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference among other populations(F<0.05).The order of rosette percentage was Yellow River population>Huai River population>Dongting Lake population>Poyang Lake population>Taihu Lake population.(3) On the percentage of EaR of T lymphocyte, Yellow River population was significantly higher than that of Poyang Lake population(P<0.05),Taihu Lake population was highly significantly lower than that of the other four populations(F>0.01),there was no significant difference among other populations(P>0.05).The order of EaR percentage was Yellow River population>Huai River population>Dongting Lake popuation>Poyang lake population>Taihu Lake population.(4) On the activity of leukocyte phagocyte,there was no significant difference between Huai River population and Poyang Lake population(P>0.05),while there was highly significant defference among other populations(F>0.01).The order of activity was Yellow River population>Dongting Lake population>Huai River population>Poyang Lake population>Taihu Lake population.From above all,it could be concluded that Yellow River population was the highest one on non-specific immune functions while Taihu Lake population was the lowest one.
Keywords:soft-shelled turtle  Yellow River populaiton  Huai River population  Dongting Lake population  Poyang Lake population  Taihu Lake population  non-specific immunity
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号