首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Kinetic analyses of waterborne Ca and Cd transport and their interactions in the gills of rainbow trout (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Oncorhynchus mykiss</Emphasis>) and yellow perch (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Perca flavescens</Emphasis>), two species differing greatly in acute waterborne Cd sensitivity
Authors:Email author" target="_blank">S?NiyogiEmail author  C?M?Wood
Institution:(1) Department of Biology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
Abstract:We evaluated the differential nature of interactions between waterborne Ca and Cd transport in the gills of yellow perch (Perca flavescens) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), two species with a more than 400-fold difference in acute waterborne Cd tolerance. The Jmax (maximum rate of uptake) and Km (inverse of affinity) for Ca uptake, in the absence of Cd, were significantly lower in yellow perch (120.48 nM g–1 wet wt h–1 and 92.17 mgrM, respectively) relative to rainbow trout (188.68 nM g–1 wet wt h–1 and 243.90 mgrM, respectively). Similarly, the Jmax for Cd uptake, at the lowest waterborne Ca level (100 mgrM) tested, was significantly lower in yellow perch (0.27 nM g–1 wet wt h–1) relative to rainbow trout (0.40 nM g–1 wet wt h–1), but no significant difference was observed in the Km values between the two species (yellow perch: 32.47 nM; rainbow trout: 31.27 nM). Waterborne Cd (0–890 nM) as well as waterborne Ca (100–1,000 mgrM) competitively inhibited branchial uptake of each other in both species. However, analyses of inhibitor constants for branchial Ca uptake by waterborne Cd ( $$ {\text{K}}_{{{\text{i}}{\text{Cd}}^{{2 + }} ]}} $$ ) revealed that the inhibition was about 1.8 times more potent in rainbow trout compared to yellow perch. In contrast, analyses of inhibitor constants for branchial Cd uptake by waterborne Ca ( $$ {\text{K}}_{{{\text{i}}{\text{Ca}}^{{2 + }} ]}} $$ ) indicated that the inhibition was more than three fold more potent in yellow perch than in rainbow trout. Higher branchial Ca uptake and more potent inhibition by Cd as well as higher branchial Cd uptake and less potent inhibition by Ca were also reflected in whole-body measurements of Ca and Cd influx in trout relative to perch. Overall, whole-body effects were in accord with the branchial kinetic analyses. These results further strengthen the conclusion that branchial influxes of Ca and Cd occur through common pathways. Moreover, interspecific differences in acute waterborne Cd sensitivity can be explained, at least in part, by the differential nature of interactions between waterborne Ca and Cd transport in fish gills.Abbreviations FAAS flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer - GFAAS graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometer - J max maximum rate of uptake - K i inhibitor constant - K m substrate concentration at which the rate of uptake is half of the Jmax - 96 h LC50 concentration at which 50% mortality occurs after 96 h Communicated by L.C.-H. WangThis revised version was published online in February 2004 with corrections to the abbreviation $$ {\text{K}}_{{{\text{i}}{\text{Ca}}^{{2 + }} ]}} $$ .
Keywords:Ca  Cd  Gill  Yellow perch  Rainbow trout
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号