首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

污染场地土壤生态风险评估研究进展
引用本文:王美娥,丁寿康,郭观林,李勖之,姜瑢,张媛,谢天. 污染场地土壤生态风险评估研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(11): 3946-3958. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202011.035
作者姓名:王美娥  丁寿康  郭观林  李勖之  姜瑢  张媛  谢天
作者单位:1.中国科学院生态环境研究中心城市与区域生态国家重点实验室, 北京 100085;2.中国科学院大学资源与环境学院, 北京 100049;3.生态环境部土壤与农业农村生态环境监管技术中心, 北京 100012;4.生态环境部南京环境科学研究所国家环境保护土壤环境管理与污染控制重点实验室, 南京 210042
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1800505)资助
摘    要:随着我国快速城市化以及产业结构的调整,遗留下了大量的污染场地,发展和实施污染场地土壤生态风险评估是进行大规模污染场地修复行动的必要条件。本文围绕污染场地土壤生态风险评估的科学原理、框架构建及技术方法等方面的关键问题: 1)评估框架的场地实际针对性;2)概念模型的不确定性;3)土壤复合污染毒性机制;4)评估终点筛选;5)评估方法和框架构建等展开讨论,指出土壤复合污染的制毒机制,即污染物生物有效性和联合效应是污染场地土壤生态风险评估的关键科学问题。耦合美国环保局四步法和欧盟层级法的“证据-权重法”评估框架适用于野外复杂环境条件下的土壤污染生态风险评估。建议今后重点开展以下5个方面的工作: 1)污染场地土壤生态风险评估技术框架与风险管控技术框架之间的联合;2)概念模型研究;3)基于过程的场地土壤污染物反应运移模型研究;4)场地土壤复合污染生态毒理学机制研究;5)生态系统高水平生态风险评估终点研究。旨在为形成我国本土污染场地土壤生态风险评估技术指南提供理论基础和构架。

关 键 词:土壤复合污染  联合效应评估  生物有效性  评估终点  证据-权重法  
收稿时间:2020-03-03

Advances in ecological risk assessment of soil in contaminated sites
WANG Mei-e,DING Shou-kang,GUO Guan-lin,LI Xu-zhi,JIANG Rong,ZHANG Yuan,XIE Tian. Advances in ecological risk assessment of soil in contaminated sites[J]. The journal of applied ecology, 2020, 31(11): 3946-3958. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202011.035
Authors:WANG Mei-e  DING Shou-kang  GUO Guan-lin  LI Xu-zhi  JIANG Rong  ZHANG Yuan  XIE Tian
Abstract:With the rapid urbanization and industrial structure adjustment in China, many contaminated sites have been left for remediation. It is essential to develop and implement ecological risk assessment (ERA) before remediating contaminated sites at a large scale as well as sequential management. In this review, we discussed the key problems in ecological risk assessment of soils in contaminated sites focusing on scientific principles, frameworks, techniques, and approaches, including 1) the site-specific framework, 2) uncertainty of conceptual model, 3) toxic mechanisms of combined contamination in soil, 4) screening of assessment endpoints, and 5) development of assessing approaches and frameworks. Then, two perspectives were addressed: the toxicological mechanism of soil combined pollution including bioavailability of contaminants in soil and their joint effect is the scientific problem in ecological risk assessment of soil in contaminated site; and weight of evidence approach based on USEPA four-step approach and EU Tier approach is applicable for ecological risk assessment in field conditions. Future studies should focus on: 1) the coordination of ecological risk assessment (ERA) framework and risk management framework, 2) conceptual mo-del, 3) process-based reactive transport models for exposure evaluation, 4) ecotoxicological mechanism of combined contamination in site soil, and 5) high ecological level endpoints. The aim of this review was to provide theoretical base and framework for the establishment of local guideline of ecological risk assessment in China.
Keywords:combined pollution of soil  assessment of joint effect  bioavailability  assessment endpoints  weight of evidence approach  
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号