Induction of linked suppression in addition to the donor H-2 class I-specific unresponsiveness in recipient T cells by transfusing class I plus class II-disparate, but not class I alone-disparate, bone marrow cells

This study was undertaken to determine whether bone marrow (BM) cells contain a cell population with the capacity to induce an unresponsiveness of T cells specific to the BM self-H-2 class I antigens in vivo, i.e., veto cell population. Recombinant or congenic mice were infused intravenously with H-2-incompatible BM cells. One to several weeks later, donor H-2-and irrelevant H-2-specific responses in mixed lymphocyte reaction cultures of recipient T cells were assessed. Transfusion of H-2-incompatible BM of C57BL/10 (B10) recombinant strains caused a long-lasting cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) unresponsiveness to the donor class I antigens in recipient lymph node cells. When class I plus class II-disparate BM cells were transfused, an anti-donor class I CTL response and a response against a third-party class I antigen, which was presented on the stimulator cells coexpressing the donor class I and class II, were significantly suppressed. This linked suppression lasted for less than 2 weeks after transfusion. Transfusion of class I-alone-disparate BM induced the donor class I-specific CTL unresponsiveness, but not the linked suppression. The induction of linked suppression was prevented considerably by transfusing nylon wool-nonadherent BM or by treating recipients with cyclophosphamide 2 days before transfusion. An anti-third-party class I CTL response, stimulated in vitro with fully allogeneic spleen cells, was not hampered by the BM transfusion. Coculturing the lymph node (LN) cells obtained from the class I plus class II-disparate BM recipient with normal LN cells interfered with the generation of both anti-donor class I and anti-linked third-party class I CTL, whereas, coculturing LN cells from the class I alone-disparate BM recipient inhibited neither specificity of CTL generation. Transfusion of class I plus class II-disparate BM resulted in a significant suppression of the donor class II-specific proliferative response. In contrast, transfusion of class I alone-disparate BM did not suppress any proliferative responses, including even a "linked" third-party class II-specific response. Transfusion of bm 1, (B6 X bm 1)F1, or (bm 1 X bm 12)F1 BM to B6 did not induce unresponsiveness in bm 1-specific CTL responses. However, the transfusion resulted in a significant suppression of bm 1-reactive proliferative response of recipient LN cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)