首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Enriching Our Views on Clinical Ethics: Results of a Qualitative Study of the Moral Psychology of Healthcare Ethics Committee Members
Authors:Eric Racine
Affiliation:(1) Neuroethics Research Unit, IRCM, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;(2) Department of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;(3) Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;(4) Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal (IRCM), 110 avenue des Pins Ouest, Montreal, Quebec, H2W lR7, Canada
Abstract:The contribution of healthcare ethics committee (HEC) members to HECs is fundamental. However, little is known about how HEC members view clinical ethics. We report results from a qualitative study of the moral psychology of HEC members. We found that contrary to the existing Kohlberg-based studies, HEC members hold a pragmatic non-expert view of clinical ethics based mainly on respect for persons and a commitment to the patient’s good. In general, HEC members hold deflationary views regarding moral theory. Ethical principles are not abstract foundations but the expression of moral commitments to patients that pre-exist awareness of moral theory. Emotions and proximity to patient sufferance fundamentally shape the views of HEC members on clinical ethics. Further work at the intersection of clinical ethics and qualitative research could bring to the foreground lay perspectives on moral problems that may differ from bioethics expert views.
Keywords:Healthcare ethics committee  Moral psychology  Pragmatism  Clinical ethics  Healthcare ethics committee members
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号