包容性视角下城镇化质量与资源利用的协调性——以中国288个地级以上城市为例

从包容性视角探究城镇化质量与资源利用之间的协调性及其影响因素,有益于完善城镇化质量的内涵,并可为政府制定城镇化健康发展的深化路径提供指引.本研究将包容性理念融入城镇化质量和资源利用的内涵中,结合GIS技术和协调度模型分析了中国288个地级以上城市城镇化质量与资源利用协调性的空间格局,并探讨了成因.结果表明: 中国城镇化发展的包容性水平整体较低,突出表现为发展机会不均等、高水平城市点状分散分布、低水平城市大范围集中分布;资源利用总体处于中等水平,高、低水平城市集聚特征明显且以胡焕庸线为界.城镇化质量与资源利用的协调度平均值为0.59,总体属于中等协调水平,并呈现级差化和东西向的梯度分异格局.较高协调水平的城市分布与东南沿海城市群的契合度较好,中等以上水平城市的分布与我国东南沿海和长江经济带构成的“T”型轴带比较吻合,较低水平的城市集中分布在黄河中上游、江南丘陵、东北地区西北部和云贵高原4个地区.城市行政等级与经济发展水平正向影响城镇化质量与资源利用的协调性,城市规模与协调性水平在300万人以上城市中存在明显的正相关关系.

Coordination of urbanization quality and resource utilization in inclusive perspective: Taking 288 cities in China as an example

To explore the coordination between urbanization quality and resource utilization and its influencing factors from the perspective of inclusiveness is conducive to expanding the connotation of urbanization quality, which could provide guidance for improving the quality of urbanization. By integrating the concept of inclusiveness into the connotation of urbanization quality and resource utilization, we analyzed the spatial pattern of the coordination of urbanization quality and resource utilization in 288 cities above prefecture level in China with the GIS technology and coordination degree model, with the potential causes being discussed. The results showed that the inclusive level of China’s urbanization development was low, which was characterized by unequal development opportunities, scattered distribution of high-level cities and large-scale centralized distribution of low-level cities. The overall utilization of resources was at the middle level. The agglomeration chara-cteristics of high- and low-level cities were significant and bounded by Hu Huanyong line. The average coordination degree of urbanization quality and resource utilization was 0.59, which belonged to the medium level, with the grade-difference and the east-west gradient pattern. Urban distribution with high coordination level fitted southeast coastal urban agglomerations well. The distribution of cities above the middle level was in good agreement with that of the “T” type axial belt in China formed by the southeastern coast of China and the Yangtze River economic belt. The lower level cities were concentrated in the middle and upper reaches of the Yellow River, Jiangnan hills, north-west part of the Northeast and Yungui Plateau. The level of urban administration and the level of economic development were positively related to the coordination between urbanization quality and resource utilization. There was a significant correlation between the urban scale and the level of coordination in the city with more than 3 million population.