The Effect of Selected Growth-Promoting and Growth-Inhibiting Substances on the Extension of Segments of Etiolated Tomato Seedling Hypocotyls

The effects of a number of growth-promoting and growth-inhibitingsubstances, including two fungal toxins, were studied on theextension of segments of etiolated tomato seedling hypocotyls.The bioassay was sensitive to small quantities of NaF, coumarinand ₂, ₄-DNP and inhibition was observed at all concentrations.₂, ₄-DNP or Iodoacetate stimulated growth at concentrationsbetween 1? 10^–4 and 5 ? 10^–6M. or 1 ? 10^–6and 1 ? 10^–7M. respectively. Inhibitor experiments inbuffered nutrient solution were approximately 10 per cent. moresensitive than those in deionized water. By means of paper partition chromatography small quantitiesof two fungal toxins, fusaric and alternaric acid were chromatographedand bioassayed. The effect of fussric acid (5, n-butyI picolinicacid) on hypocoty1 growth was detected at concentrations aslow as 1 ? 10^–5M. Experiments with recongnized growth-promoting substances showedthat Kinetin inhibited growth at concentrations up to 1 ?10^–8M.in both light and dark. IAA inhibited growth up to 1 ? 10^–6M.At 1 ? 10^–7 and 1 ? 10^–8 only small increases occurredwith IAA and the effect of light was negligible. Gibberellicacid (GA₂)stimulated growth at concentrations from 10^–3to 10^–7M. and significant increases up to 17 per cent.were recorded in the light. Since the light induced inhibitionwas only partly restored, the existence of some other naturallight sensitive growth substance is suggested. The value ofthe bioassay as a method for estimating natural growth-inhibitingand growth-promoting substances is discussed.