首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Unravelling the drivers of aquatic communities using disparate organismal groups and different taxonomic levels
Affiliation:1. Geological Survey of Norway (NGU), Geo-Environment Division, P.O. Box 6315 Sluppen, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway;2. University of Zurich, Department of Geography, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland;3. CNRS UMR6554, Laboratoire Géolittomer, Campus du Tertre, BP 81227, 44312 Nantes cedex 3, France;4. Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Geosciences and Geography, Von-Seckendorff-Platz 4, D-06120 Halle (Saale), Germany;2. Renewable Energies Chair, University of Évora, Casa Cordovil, Rua D. Augusto Eduardo Nunes nº7, Évora, 7000-651, Portugal;1. University of Eastern Finland, Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland;2. Finnish Environment Institute, Laboratories/Research and Innovation Laboratory, P.O. Box 35, University of Jyväskylä, FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland;3. Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;4. Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, National Institute for Coastal and Marine Management/RIKZ, P.O. Box 207, 9750 AE Haren, The Netherlands;5. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Effect-Directed Analysis, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany;6. University of Jyväskylä, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland
Abstract:Bioassessment and monitoring methods should be as cost-efficient as possible. Limiting the number of sites is not a practical solution to face the financial challenges related to bioassessment. Hence, it is highly important to find inexpensive ways to assess and monitor human-impacted environments. Suggestions have been made to use coarser taxonomic levels because they require less expertise and time, or to use single surrogate taxonomic groups that indicate the overall state of ecosystems. In this study, we examined the level of within-taxon and cross-taxon congruence of aquatic bacterial, diatom and macroinvertebrate communities, while simultaneously assessing the chemical, physical and spatial drivers of community structure in these organismal groups. Our study area was an extensively sampled large lake system with high connectivity between sites. Thus, we ensured that spatial processes, if they existed, were well portrayed in our data. Our aim was to find out the taxonomic levels sufficient for the purposes of bioassessment and to detect possible surrogate taxonomic groups. We found that bacterial communities were best associated with pure effects of water chemistry, whereas diatom and macroinvertebrate communities were varyingly related to chemical, physical and spatial variables. Macroinvertebrates were the only group related to small-scale spatial variables, while bacteria and diatoms were associated with variables illustrating spatial relations among sites at large and intermediate scales. Overall, the three organismal groups were mainly related to different chemical parameters. Also, the three organismal groups showed only weak, if any, congruent patterns in their community structure. Thus, we do not recommend the use of only one biological group as a surrogate in bioassessment. However, we found that higher taxonomic levels of all three studied organismal groups could be used as surrogates for finer-level taxonomic assignments. Our findings are promising for the possible use of bacteria in future bioassessment and monitoring. Owing to the characteristics of very large lake systems, our findings may be applied to similarly highly connected ecosystems, such as marine coastal systems.
Keywords:Bacteria  Bioassessment  Diatoms  Macroinvertebrates  Taxonomic surrogacy  Higher-taxon approach
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号