A new approach to species distributional indicators for the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Tecnolog. y Serv. Agrarios S.A., Calle Julian Camarillo Ed. B, 6, 28037 Madrid, Spain;2. IEO – Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Santander, Promontorio San Martín s/n, 39004 Santander, Spain;1. Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Villavägen 16, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden;2. Centre for Natural Disaster Science (CNDS), Villavägen 16, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden;3. Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstr. 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland;1. Université Paris-Est, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d''Alfort, Maisons-Alfort F-94704, France;2. Aérial, Institut technique agro-industriel, Parc d''Innovation, 250 rue Laurent Fries, Illkirch F-67412, France;1. Darrin Fresh Water Institute, 5060 Lakeshore Drive, Bolton Landing, NY 12814, USA;2. Department of Biological Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 8th Street, MRC 238, Troy, NY 12180, USA |
| |
Abstract: | We propose alternative fish-populations spatial indicators for use in the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). Following Commission Decision 2010/477, we have applied two different spatial indicators to three fish populations with “slow type” life-history traits, i.e. slow growing like Helicolenus dactylopterus, or large bodied like Merluccius merluccius and Lophius budegassa. We tested their efficiency separately and combined. One of these indicators, the presence/absence of the population in sampling squares, had already been applied during the initial assessment of the MSFD in Spain. Another indicator, the geographical spread, is proposed here as a new monitoring tool for the MSFD in Spanish waters. The results demonstrate for the three populations analyzed that neither indicator was sufficient alone to describe the population spatial pattern or its evolution. Thus, the approach to implementing the MSFD indicated in Commission Decision 2010/477 is not sufficient to provide integrated information about the spatial behavior of the fish populations analyzed. Although numerical targets or threshold values cannot be set, directional targets could be proposed, based on the results of both indicators, if evaluation of them is extended to more species and more geographical areas. The analysis could be extended to other “slow type” populations within the fish community and also to different ecoregions. We propose an approach including the estimation of two different indicators to monitoring both the area occupied and the geographical spread of fish populations within communities, interpreting them together to generate a more complete picture of the spatial patterns of those populations. In spite of the difficulties in fixing numerical targets or thresholds, or in distinguishing between environmentally and human driven changes in the population spatial distributions, this approach helps to summarize fish spatial behavior. It improves information from the indicators applied alone and reduces the requirement for a large number of maps (except for some particular event or population). The proposed indicators can be readily used by managers and politicians. |
| |
Keywords: | Fish population distribution Geographical spread Spatial indicators Marine strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|