首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


An indicator framework for assessing progress in land and marine planning in Colombia and Cuba
Institution:1. Joaquin Aaron Manjarres Research Group, University Sergio Arboleda, Calle 18 No. 14A – 18, Santa Marta, Colombia;2. Marine Affairs Program, Dalhousie University, P.O. Box 15000, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada;3. Multidisciplinary Study Center of Coastal Zones (CEMZOC), Universidad de Oriente, Las Américas Avenue s/n, CP 90500 Santiago de Cuba, Cuba;4. Research Center in Solar Energy, Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment, Micro III, District Abel Santamaría, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba;1. School of Geography and Planning, Center of Integrated Geographic Information Analysis, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China;2. Department of Geography, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;3. Department of Geography, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0131, USA;1. Virginia Water Resources Research Center, 210 Cheatham Hall, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA;2. Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, 416 Smyth Hall, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA;3. Illinois Natural History Survey, 1816 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA;4. Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, 210 Cheatham Hall, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA;1. Environmental Policy Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Hollandseweg 1, P.O. Box 8130, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands;2. Biometris, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands;;3. Business Economics, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Hollandseweg 1, P.O. Box 8130, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands;1. CLME+ Project Coordination Unit, UNDP/GEF Caribbean and North Brazil Shelf Large Marine Ecosystems (CLME+) Project, Cartagena, Colombia;2. Marine Affairs Program, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada;3. Centre for Resource Management and Environmental Studies of the University of the West Indies (UWI-CERMES), Cave Hill Campus, Barbados;4. Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), Rome, Italy;5. Caribbean Regional Fisheries Mechanism (CRFM) Secretariat, Belize City, Belize;6. The Caribbean Environment Programme, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP CEP), Kingston, Jamaica;7. Central America Fisheries and Aquaculture Organization (OSPESCA), Salvador City, El Salvador;8. UNESCO IOC Subcommission for the Caribbean and Adjacent Regions (IOCARIBE), Cartagena, Colombia;9. Western Central Atlantic Fishery Commission, Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO – WECAFC), Bridgetown, Barbados;10. Consultant, United Kingdom
Abstract:Achievement of environmental management goals and objectives in coastal areas, including how to measure success, remains a significant subject for discussion among scholars and practitioners, meanwhile four distinct management efforts potentially converge within the coastal zone: land-use planning (LUP), river basin management (RBM), marine spatial planning (MSP) and integrated coastal management (ICM). This paper examines the general lack of attention being paid to overlapping spatial boundaries within the landward and marine areas and proposes an indicator-based framework to measure the effectiveness of the individual planning instruments, as opposed to specific initiatives, in achieving management goals. The six indicators used in the framework (planning; participation; communication; integration; responsibility and balance) are based on a modified version of the Coastal Sustainability Standard methodology described by Gallagher (2010). The framework provides for four scenarios of progress in three geographical dimensions (river, municipality and marine area) to be assessed. For this study, the Caribbean coast of Colombia and Cuba were identified as the areas to test the feasibility and relevance of the indicator framework to monitor progress in the different management approaches established to achieve coastal sustainability. Several key observations and lessons from the indicator-based framework are discussed in order to analyze the overlapping of the four space-based instruments, identify areas for targeted intervention and improve their integration.
Keywords:Integrated coastal management (ICM)  River basin management (RBM)  Marine spatial planning (MSP)  Land use planning (LUP)  Planning instruments  Indicators  Effectiveness of ICM  Cuba  Colombia
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号