首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

青藏高原高寒草甸初级生产力及其主要影响因素
引用本文:布仁巴音,徐广平,段吉闯,常小峰,张振华,汪诗平.青藏高原高寒草甸初级生产力及其主要影响因素[J].广西植物,2010,30(6):760-769.
作者姓名:布仁巴音  徐广平  段吉闯  常小峰  张振华  汪诗平
作者单位:1.中国科学院 西北高原生物研究所 高原生物适应与进化重点实验室, 西宁 810008; 2. 广西壮族自治区 中国科学院 广西植物研究所, 广西 桂林 541006; 3.中国科学院 青藏高原研究所, 北京 100085; 4.中国科学院 研究生院, 北京 100049
基金项目:国家"973"项目,国家自然科学基金
摘    要:青藏高原有各类天然草地14×108hm2,其中高寒草甸和高寒灌丛约占青藏高原天然草地面积的50%,占全国草地总面积的16.2%。嵩草草甸是高寒草甸的主体,包括矮嵩草草甸、金露梅灌丛草甸、藏嵩草草甸、小嵩草草甸和高山嵩草草甸等,这5类高寒草甸平均地上生物量分别为354.2、422.4、445.1、227.3和368.5g/m2,地下生物量分别为3389.6、3548.3、11922.7、4439.3、5604.8g/m2,地下与地上生物量的比例分别为10.55、10.15、27.82、14.82和15.21,远大于IPCC(2006)报告中地下/地上生物量比例的默认值(2.8±95%)。地下生物量对气候变化和放牧的反应比地上生物量更敏感,干旱和重度放牧均降低了地下/地上生物量的比例。在极度退化状态下地下/地上生物量的比例2。对于轻度和中度退化的高寒草甸应以围封禁牧为主要恢复措施,但如果结合补播和施肥,则恢复速率会加快;对于重度和极度退化的高寒草甸,由于草地植物群落中优良牧草的比例极低,仅靠自然恢复很难进行恢复或需要的年限很长,所以必须采用人工重建的措施,并结合毒杂草防除和施肥等措施进行恢复,通过建立人工或半人工草地的措施予以重建。

关 键 词:高寒草甸  初级生产力  放牧  气候变化  退化草甸恢复

Primary productivity and its main affecting factors of Alpine meadows on the Tibetan plateau
Burenbayin,XU Guang-Ping,DUAN Ji-Chuang,CHANG Xiao-Feng,ZHANG Zhen-Hu,WANG Shi-Ping.Primary productivity and its main affecting factors of Alpine meadows on the Tibetan plateau[J].Guihaia,2010,30(6):760-769.
Authors:Burenbayin  XU Guang-Ping  DUAN Ji-Chuang  CHANG Xiao-Feng  ZHANG Zhen-Hu  WANG Shi-Ping
Institution:1.Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Haibei Alpine Meadow Ecosystem Research Station, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China; 2.Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin 541006, China; 3.Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; 4.Graduate University, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Abstract:Alpine meadows and shrublands are approximately 7×108 hm2 which is about 50% of the natural grasslands on the Tibtean plateau and accounts for about 16.2% of the total grassland area in China. Alpine meadow is dominated by Kobresia meadow,including K.humilis meadow,Potentilla fruticosa shrub meadow,Kobresia tibetica meadow,K.parva meadow and K.pygmaea meadow. The average aboveground biomass of the five meadows was 354.2,422.4,445.1,227.3 and 368.5 g/m2,respectively,while the belowground biomass of 0-40 or 0-50 cm soil depth was 3 389.6,3 548.3,11 922.7,4 439.3 and 5 604.8 g/m2,respectively. Their ratios of belowground and aboveground biomass were 10.55,10.15,27.82,14.82 and 15.21 respectively,which were much higher than that of the default value(2.8±95%)recommended by IPCC(2006). The belowground biomass or belowground net primary productivity was more sensitive to the climate change and heavy grazing than above-grassland biomass did. Drought and heavy grazing decreased the ratio of belowground to aboveground biomass,even its value was less than 2 under extreme degradation conditions. Natural restoration is possible for light or moderate degraded alpine meadow for 3-8 years. However,it should be re-constructed for heavy or extreme degraded alpine meadow due to soil quality decrease and poison plant species and weeds invasion.
Keywords:alpine meadow  primary productivity  grazing  climate change  restoration of degraded alpine meadow
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《广西植物》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《广西植物》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号