The importance of individual developmental variation in stage‐structured population models |
| |
Authors: | Perry de Valpine Katherine Scranton Jonas Knape Karthik Ram Nicholas J Mills |
| |
Institution: | 1. Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, , Berkeley, CA 94720, USA;2. Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, , New Haven, CT 6520, USA;3. Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, , Uppsala 750 07, Sweden |
| |
Abstract: | Population stage structure is fundamental to ecology, and models of this structure have proven useful in many different systems. Many ecological variables other than stage, such as habitat type, site occupancy and metapopulation status are also modelled using transitions among discrete states. Transitions among life stages can be characterised by the distribution of time spent in each stage, including the mean and variance of each stage duration and within‐individual correlations among multiple stage durations. Three modelling traditions represent stage durations differently. Matrix models can be derived as a long‐run approximation from any distribution of stage durations, but they are often interpreted directly as a Markov model for stage transitions. Statistical stage‐duration distribution models accommodate the variation typical of cohort development data, but such realism has rarely been incorporated in population theory or statistical population models. Delay‐differential equation models include lags but no variation, except in limited cases. We synthesise these models in one framework and illustrate how individual variation and correlations in development can impact population growth. Furthermore, different development models can yield the same long‐term matrix transition rates but different sensitivities and elasticities. Finally, we discuss future directions for estimating realistic stage duration models from data. |
| |
Keywords: | Cohort model matrix population model delay‐differential equation model life‐history theory stage‐structured phenology stage‐structured development individual heterogeneity population growth rate sensitivity and elasticity analysis autocorrelated growth |
|
|