首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


The potential for indirect effects between co‐flowering plants via shared pollinators depends on resource abundance,accessibility and relatedness
Authors:Luísa Gigante Carvalheiro  Jacobus Christiaan Biesmeijer  Gita Benadi  Jochen Fründ  Martina Stang  Ignasi Bartomeus  Christopher N. Kaiser‐Bunbury  Mathilde Baude  Sofia I. F. Gomes  Vincent Merckx  Katherine C. R. Baldock  Andrew T. D. Bennett  Ruth Boada  Riccardo Bommarco  Ralph Cartar  Natacha Chacoff  Juliana Dänhardt  Lynn V. Dicks  Carsten F. Dormann  Johan Ekroos  Kate S.E. Henson  Andrea Holzschuh  Robert R. Junker  Martha Lopezaraiza‐Mikel  Jane Memmott  Ana Montero‐Castaño  Isabel L. Nelson  Theodora Petanidou  Eileen F. Power  Maj Rundlöf  Henrik G. Smith  Jane C. Stout  Kehinde Temitope  Teja Tscharntke  Thomas Tscheulin  Montserrat Vilà  William E. Kunin
Affiliation:1. School of Biology, University of Leeds, , Leeds, LS2 9JT UK;2. Naturalis Biodiversity Center, , RA Leiden, 2300 The Netherlands;3. Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystems Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, , Amsterdam, The Netherlands;4. Department of Biometry and Environmental Systems Analysis, University of Freiburg, , Freiburg i. Br, 79106 Germany;5. Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, , Ontario, N1G 2W1 Canada;6. Institute of Biology, University of Leiden, , RA Leiden, 2300 The Netherlands;7. Estación Biológica de Do?ana (EBD‐CSIC), , Sevilla, Spain;8. Ecological Networks, Department of Biology, TU Darmstadt, , 64287 Darmstadt, Germany;9. School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, , Bristol, BS8 1UG UK;10. Collégium Sciences et Techniques (LBLGC‐1207), Université d'Orléans, , Orléans, F‐45067 France;11. Centre for Integrative Ecology, Deakin University, , Victoria, 3217 Australia;12. Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, , Uppsala, SE‐75007 Sweden;13. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, , Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4 Canada;14. Fac. de Cs Nat. e IML, Instituto de Ecología Regional, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, , Tucumán, Argentina;15. Centre for Environmental and Climate Research & Department of Biology, Lund University, , Lund, S‐223 62 Sweden;16. Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, , Cambridge, UK;17. Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, University of Würzburg, , Würzburg, 97074 Germany;18. Department of Organismic Biology, University Salzburg, , Salzburg, 5020 Austria;19. Unidad Académica en Desarrollo Sustentable, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, , Guerrero, 40900 México;20. Department of Geography, Laboratory of Biogeography and Ecology, University of the Aegean, , Mytilene, Lesvos, 81100 Greece;21. School of Natural Sciences and Trinity Centre for Biodiversity Research, Trinity College Dublin, , Dublin 2, Ireland;22. Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, , Stellenbosch, South Africa;23. Department of Zoology, Obafemi Awolowo University, , Ile‐Ife, Nigeria;24. Agroecology, Goettingen University, , Goettingen, Germany
Abstract:Co‐flowering plant species commonly share flower visitors, and thus have the potential to influence each other's pollination. In this study we analysed 750 quantitative plant–pollinator networks from 28 studies representing diverse biomes worldwide. We show that the potential for one plant species to influence another indirectly via shared pollinators was greater for plants whose resources were more abundant (higher floral unit number and nectar sugar content) and more accessible. The potential indirect influence was also stronger between phylogenetically closer plant species and was independent of plant geographic origin (native vs. non‐native). The positive effect of nectar sugar content and phylogenetic proximity was much more accentuated for bees than for other groups. Consequently, the impact of these factors depends on the pollination mode of plants, e.g. bee or fly pollinated. Our findings may help predict which plant species have the greatest importance in the functioning of plant–pollination networks.
Keywords:Facilitation  floral traits  flower density  flower resources  indirect interactions  interspecific competition  morphological similarity  nectar  phylogenetic distance  plant–  pollinator networks
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号