| Abstract: | Growth promoting properties and selectivity of 11 commercially produced media recommended for Salmonella and Shigella isolation were evaluated. The following media were tested: EMB (Eosin methylene blue agar), Endo, P?oskiriew, MacConkey, DC (Deoxycholate citrate agar), SS (Salmonella-Shigella agar), BS (Bismuth sulfite agar) and Mueller-Hinton as a medium with no selective properties. The media were produced in Czechoslovakia, East Germany, West Germany, Poland, and Soviet Union. Quantitative studies were performed on 71 strains representing 8 genera of Enterobacteriaceae family; both reference and wild newly + isolated from clinical material strains were included. It was found that none of DC and BS media provided suitable growth conditions for Shigella strains and in particular for S. dysenteriae, S. boydii, and S. flexneri. It was also found that the same medium (name and content) but derived from different producer can vary significantly in respect to growth promotion and selectivity especially for Shigella strains. All media with selective, differentiating properties for Salmonella and Shigella isolation should not be used without previous quantitative control test for their selective and growth promoting properties checked by user. The need for such a control performed both on reference and freshly isolated strains was shown in this study. In the set of control strains all species of Shigella should be represented. |
