|
|||||
|
|
A comment on Farwell (2012): brain fingerprinting: a comprehensive tutorial review of detection of concealed information with event-related brain potentials |
|
| Authors: | Ewout H Meijer Gershon Ben-Shakhar Bruno Verschuere Emanuel Donchin |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, PO BOX 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands 2. Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel 3. Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 4. Department of Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium 5. Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA |
| Abstract: | In a recent issue of Cognitive Neurodynamics Farwell (Cogn Neurodyn 6:115–154, 2012) published a comprehensive tutorial review of the use of Event Related Brain Potentials (ERP) in the detection of concealed information. Farwell’s review covered much of his own work employing his “brain fingerprinting” technology. All his work showed a 100 % accuracy rate in detecting concealed information. We argue in this comment that Farwell (Cogn Neurodyn 6:115–154, 2012) is misleading and misrepresents the scientific status of brain fingerprinting technology. |
| Keywords: | Concealed information test (CIT) Guilty knowledge test (GKT) Brain fingerprinting P300 |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ | |