Spillover from marine protected areas to adjacent fisheries has an ecological and a fishery component |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Université Côte d''Azur, CNRS, FRE 3729 ECOMERS, Parc Valrose 28, Avenue Valrose, 06108 Nice, France;2. Consorzio Interuniversitario per le Scienze del Mare, CoNISMa, Piazzale Flaminio 9, 00196 Rome, Italy;3. Centre for Ocean Life, National Institute of Aquatic Resources (DTU-Aqua), Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark;4. CNR-IAMC, Mazara del Vallo, Via Vaccara 61, 91026 Mazara del Vallo, TP, Italy;5. Network of Marine Protected Area Managers in the Mediterranean (MedPAN), Marseille, France;6. National Center for Scientific Research, CRIOBE, USR 3278 CNRS-EPHE-UPVD, Perpignan, France;7. Laboratoire d''Excellence CORAIL, France;8. Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93117, USA;9. Departamento de Ecología e Hidrología, Universidad de Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain;10. ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia;11. Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, 3029 Cordley Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA;12. Centro de Formação em Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Federal do Sul da Bahia, Campus Sosígenes Costa, Porto Seguro 45810-000, Brazil;13. Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, 120 Oceanview Blvd., Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), if well designed and managed, can produce conservation benefits to fish assemblages within no-take zones and fishery benefits in neighboring areas through ‘spillover’. However, although plenty of studies have provided evidence of the benefits produced within MPA boundaries, overall benefits to local fisheries, especially via spillover, seem to be still unclear. Because of the lost fishing grounds following an MPA establishment, local fishermen usually oppose MPAs. There is, therefore, the urgent need for a better understanding of the mechanism(s) through which MPAs can export fishable fish biomass towards adjacent fished areas, a process that could counterbalance the loss of fishing grounds. Here we review the literature on spillover for refining the terminology, detailing the underlying mechanisms and identifying both the existing and needed methodological approaches to measure spillover. Operationally, two types of spillover should be considered: ecological spillover (i.e. the net export of juvenile, subadult and adult biomass from MPAs outwards driven by density-dependent processes) and the fishery spillover (i.e. the proportion of this biomass that can be fished, taking into account regulations and accessibility). Underwater visual census and tagging/tracking may allow getting evidence of ecological spillover, while experimental catch data are essential to assess and monitor fishery spillover, which is the main component of MPAs that can provide direct benefit to local fisheries. |
| |
Keywords: | Marine reserve No-take zone Biomass export Density-dependent process Home-range relocation Assessment methods Fisheries benefits Catch |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|