中国甲真菌病研究文献计量学分析

目的反映国内甲真菌病研究现状,为进一步研究提供思路和依据。方法运用文献计量学方法,以中国期刊全文数据库和万方数据库为数据来源,采用高级检索方式,对1981～2011年国内甲真菌病研究文献进行定量分析。结果共检出有效文献826篇;年文献量变化呈早期较少随后出现高峰,继而进入稳定期的发展趋势;主要的产文省市为北京、江苏、广东、上海和山东,共发表文章398篇,占总文献量的48.18%;发文最多的机构为中国医学科学院皮肤病研究所和北京大学第一医院,共发文46篇,占全部文献的5.57%;发文3篇及以上的第一作者共37人,共计发表论文154篇,占第一作者总人数的4.48%;《临床皮肤科杂志》《中华皮肤科杂志》《中国皮肤性病学杂志》和《中国麻风皮肤病杂志》是甲真菌病研究的核心期刊;文献合作度为3.01,文献合著率为73.24%;主要研究内容为甲真菌病治疗疗效观察,相关文献共423篇,占总文献量的51.21%;署名为基金论文的文献45篇,占所有文献的5.45%。结论我国甲真菌病研究已进入相对稳定的发展时期,但地区间科研实力存在较大差异,基础研究较薄弱,研究者间的合作尚需加强,基金资助力度有待提高。

Bibliometric analysis of literatures on onychomycosis in China

Objective To reflect current situation of studies on onychomycosis （OM）, so as to provide thinking and evidence for further studies.Methods Quantitative analysis on OM is carried out with bibliometric method, using CNKI and Wanfang Data as resource.Results Altogether 826 literatures are effective, annual literature of OM was increased slowly at the beginning, then achieved peak and now at a stationary phase. Most of them, amounting for 48.18% of total literatures, were from Beijing, Jiangsu, Guangdong, Shanghai and Shandong. The articles, which were published by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Institute of Skin Diseases and Peking University First Hospital, added up to 5.57% of total literatures. There were 37 authors who published 3 or more articles as first author, taking 4.48% of all first authors. ＂Journal of Clinical Dermatology＂, ＂Chinese Journal of Dermatology＂, ＂The Chinese Journal of Dermatovenereology＂ and ＂China Journal of Leprosy and Skin Diseases＂ were core journals of OM research. The degree of cooperation was 3.01 and the rate of cooperation was 73.24%.There were 423 literatures about clinical effect observation, which was the major research content of OM literatures.Forty-five literatures were supported by research sponsorship, accounting for 5.45% of total literatures.Conclusion OM research in Chain has come to a relatively stable development period, however, there are big gaps between different areas in research ability, more cooperation between researchers and more scientific research funds are still needed. Basic research about pathogenesis may become the new major research direction.