开放式腹膜前间隙修补术与Lichtenstein修补术治疗腹股沟疝的比较 |
| |
引用本文: | 谢兵,陈宇飞,栾冠楠,彭页,谢国彬.开放式腹膜前间隙修补术与Lichtenstein修补术治疗腹股沟疝的比较[J].现代生物医学进展,2015,15(36):7124-7127. |
| |
作者姓名: | 谢兵 陈宇飞 栾冠楠 彭页 谢国彬 |
| |
作者单位: | 南京市浦口区中医院普通外科;中国人民解放军空军总医院骨科;中国医学科学院医学信息研究所 |
| |
基金项目: | 国家自然科学基金青年项目(81403451) |
| |
摘 要: | 目的:比较腹股沟疝采用Lichtenstein 修补术和开放式腹膜前间隙修补术的临床效果和安全性。方法:将我院普外科收治的
132例腹股沟疝患者随机分为两组,每组66 例。一组患者采用Lichtenstein 修补术进行治疗,另外一组患者采用开放式腹膜前间
隙修补术进行治疗,对比两组平均手术时间、平均术中出血量、平均术后下床时间、平均术后住院时间、平均术后恢复时间;对比
两组患者术后各种并发症的发生情况和1 年内复发情况。结果:腹膜前间隙组平均手术时间、平均术后下床时间、平均术后住院
时间、平均术后恢复时间略短于Lichtenstein 组,平均术中出血量略少于Lichtenstein 组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);腹膜前间
隙组患者各种并发症发生率及术后1 年内复发率明显低于Lichtenstein 组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:腹股沟疝采用开
放式腹膜前间隙修补术和Lichtenstein 修补术治疗的临床效果均较好,但开放式腹膜前间隙修补术的并发症发生率和1 年内复发
率更低,临床优势更明显。
|
关 键 词: | Lichtenstein 修补术 开放式腹膜前间隙修补术 腹股沟疝 感染 并发症 |
Comparative Study of the Clinical Effect of Open Preperitoneal Space Repair
and Lichtenstein Repair for Inguinal Hernia |
| |
Abstract: | Objective:To compare the clinical effect and safety of Lichtenstein repair and open preperitoneal space repair for
inguinal hernia.Methods:132 patients with inguinal hernia in the department of general surgery in our hospital were randomly divided
into two groups, 66 cases in each group. A group of patients were given Lichtenstein repair for the treatment, and another group were
received open preperitoneal space repair operation. The average operation time, average bleeding volume, mean postoperative bed time
and the average hospitalization time and average recovery time of the two groups were compared. The occurrence rate of postoperative
complications and recurrence rate at one-year between the two groups were also analyzed.Results:The mean operation time, the average
postoperative bed time, the average hospitalization time, the average recovery time and the average intraoperative bleeding volume in the
preperitoneal space group were slightly shorter than those of the Lichtenstein group, while there was no difference between the two
groups(P>0.05). The occurrence rate of postoperative complications and recurrence rate at one-year of the preperitoneal space group were
both significantly lower than those of the Lichtenstein group, and there were both statistically difference (P<0.05).Conclusion:The open
preperitoneal space repair and Lichtenstein repair treatment can both get well effect for the treatment of inguinal hernia, while the open
preperitonealspace repair operation has a lower occurrence rate of postoperative complications and the recurrence rate at one-year, which
shows more obviously clinical advantages. |
| |
Keywords: | Lichtenstein repair Open preperitoneal space repair Inguinal hernia Infection Complications |
|
| 点击此处可从《现代生物医学进展》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《现代生物医学进展》下载免费的PDF全文 |