首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Mechanical reconfiguration mediates swallowing and rejection in Aplysia californica
Authors:Valerie A Novakovic  Gregory P Sutton  David M Neustadter  Randall D Beer  Hillel J Chiel
Institution:(1) Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, 2080 Adelbert Road, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA;(2) Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, 44106-7222 Cleveland, OH, USA;(3) Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 319 Wickendon Building, 10900 Euclid Avenue, 44106-7207 Cleveland, OH, USA;(4) Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, 44106-7071 Cleveland, OH, USA;(5) Department of Neurosciences School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 2109 Adelbert Road, 44106-4975 Cleveland, OH, USA;(6) Present address: Veterans Administration Boston Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway Building 3, Room 2A110, West Roxbury, MA 02132, USA;(7) Present address: Ruth Hamoavia 3, Apt. 3, Netanya, 42756, Israel
Abstract:Muscular hydrostats, such as tongues, trunks or tentacles, have fewer constraints on their degrees of freedom than musculoskeletal systems, so changes in a structure’s shape may alter the positions and lengths of other components (i.e., induce mechanical reconfiguration). We studied mechanical reconfiguration during rejection and swallowing in the marine mollusk Aplysia californica. During rejection, inedible material is pushed out of an animal’s buccal cavity. The grasper (radula/odontophore) closes on inedible material, and then a posterior muscle, I2, pushes the grasper toward the jaws (protracts it). After the material is released, an anterior muscle complex (the I1/I3/jaw complex) pushes the grasper toward the esophagus (retracts it). During swallowing, the grasper is protracted open, and then retracts closed, pulling in food. Grasper closure changes its shape. Magnetic resonance images show that grasper closure lengthens I2. A kinetic model quantified the changes in the ability of I2 and I1/I3 to exert force as grasper shape changed. Grasper closure increases I2’s ability to protract during rejection, and increases I1/I3’s ability to retract during swallowing. Motor neurons controlling radular closure may therefore affect the behavioral outputs of I2’s and I1/I3’s motor neurons. Thus, motor neurons may modulate the outputs of other motor neurons through mechanical reconfiguration.Valerie A. Novakovic and Gregory P. Sutton contributed equally to the paper.
Keywords:Muscular hydrostat  Biomechanics  Feeding  Soft tissue  Mollusk
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号