Coexistence of two similar copepod species, <Emphasis Type="Italic">Eudiaptomus gracilis</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">E. graciloides</Emphasis>: the role of differential predator avoidance

Habitat choice in relation to environmental factors of two coexisting calanoid copepod species, Eudiaptomus gracilis and E. graciloides, was studied in a mesotrophic lake and in large indoor mesocosms. Both species and sexes showed pronounced diel vertical migration (DVM) in the field. In 12 m deep mesocosms with free ranging fish DVM was observed and species increased day depth over time. No changes were observed in copepod day depth over time in experiments with fish kairomone. It is hypothesized that fish kairomone acts as an early warning system to copepods which respond by moving deeper, but only as far as the thermocline. For full DVM, a nearby mechanical stimulus is necessary. Thus, as fish go deeper to feed, copepods retreat. The response of copepods to fish predation, in the presence of low and high numbers of Daphnia,shows that copepods effectively use Daphniaas living shields to avoid predation. The two species adopt different vertical migration strategies depending on whether there are high or low numbers of Daphniapresent. A dominant feature of mesocosm experiments was the night time aggregating (lekking) of E. gracilis males at the surface. When the spring and autumn percentages of risk takers in the epilimnion were compared, E. gracilis, particularly males, suffered the greatest cost.