The effect of behavioural and morphological plasticity on foraging efficiency in the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus sp.) |
| |
Authors: | Troy Day J. D. McPhail |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, V6T 1Z4 Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;(2) Present address: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Queen's University, Jeffery Hall, K7L 3N6 Kingston, Ontario, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | We conducted an experiment to assess the change in foraging efficiency resulting from diet-induced morphological and behavioural plasticity in a species of freshwater, threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus sp.). Different degrees of morphological and behavioural change were induced using two prey items commonly found in the diet of this species, allowing us to estimate the relative importance of each type of plasticity. The purpose of the experiment was twofold. First, earlier work had suggested that diet variability might be an important factor in the evolution of trophic morphological plasticity in sticklebacks. The present results extend this work by revealing the adaptive significance of morphological plasticity. The current experiment also qualitatively assessed the compatibility of the time scale of morphological change with that of the natural resource variability experienced by this species. The results indicate that diet-induced plasticity improves foraging efficiency continuously for up to 72 days of prey exposure. This is probably due in part to plasticity of the external trophic morphology but our results also suggest a complex interplay between morphology and behaviour. The time scale appears to be matched to that of natural diet variability although it is possible that some traits exhibit non-labile plasticity. Our discussion highlights the important distinction between conditions favouring the evolution of labile versus non-labile plasticity. The second objective of the experiment was to determine the relative importance of morphological and behavioural plasticity. Few studies have attempted to quantify the adaptive significance of morphological plasticity and no study to our knowledge has separated the effects of morphological and behavioural plasticity. Our experiment reveals that both behavioural and morphological plasticity are important and it also suggests a dichotomy between the two: behavioural plasticity predominately affects searching efficiency whereas morphological plasticity predominately affects handling efficiency. |
| |
Keywords: | Adaptive significance of plasticity Behavioural versus morphological plasticity Phenotypic plasticity Foraging efficiency Sticklebacks |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|