Locomotor activity rhythm in four wrasse species under varying light conditions

Under controlled laboratory conditions, the locomotor activity rhythms of four species of wrasses (Suezichthys gracilis, Thalassoma cupido, Labroides dimidiatus andCirrhilabrus temminckii) were individually examined using an actograph with infra-red photo-electric switches in a dark room at temperatures of 21.3–24.3°C, for 7 to 14 days. The locomotor activity ofS. gracilis occurred mostly during the light period under a light-dark cycle regimen (LD 12:12; 06:00-18:00 light, 18:00-06:00 dark). The locomotor activity commenced at the beginning of the light period and continued until a little before the beginning of dark period. The diel activity rhythm of this species synchronizes with LD. Under constant illumination (LL) this species shows distinct free-running activity rhythms varying in length from 23 hrs. 39 min. to 23 hrs. 47 min. Therefore,S. gracilis appears to have a circadian rhythm under LL. However, in constant darkness (DD), the activity of this species was greatly suppressed. All the fish showed no activity rhythms in DD conditions. After DD, the fish showed the diel activity rhythm with the resumption of LD, but this activity began shortly after the beginning of light period. The fish required several days to synchronize with the activity in the light period. Therefore,S. gracilis appeared to continue the circadian rhythm under DD. InT. cupido, the locomotor activity commenced somewhat earlier than the beginning of the light period and continued until the beginning of the dark period under LD. The diel activity rhythm of this species synchronizes with LD. Under LL, four of the five specimens of this species tested showed free-running activity rhythms for the first 5 days or longer varying in length from 22 hrs. 54 min. to 23 hrs. 39 min. Although the activity of this species was suppressed under DD, two of five fish showed free-running activity rhythms throughout the experimental period. The lengths of such free-running periods were from 23 hrs. 38 min. to 23 hrs. 50 min. under DD. Therefore, it was ascertained thatT. cupido has a circadian rhythm. InL. dimidiatus, the locomotor activity rhythm under LD resembled that observed inT. cupido. The diel activity rhythm of this species synchronizes with LD. Under LL, four of seven of this species showed free-running activity rhythms throughout the experimental period. The lengths of such free-running periods were from 23 hrs. 07 min. to 25 hrs. 48 min. Although the activity of this species was suppressed under DD, three of five fish showed free-running activity rhythms throughout the experimental period. The lengths of such free-running periods were from 23 hrs. 36 min. to 23 hrs. 41 min. under DD. Therefore, it was ascertained thatL. dimidiatus has a circadian rhythm. Almost all locomotor activity of C.temminckii occurred during the light period under LD. The diel activity rhythm of this species coincides with LD. Under LL, two of four of this species showed free-running activity rhythms throughout the experimental period. The lengths of such free-running periods were from 23 hrs. 32 min. to 23 hrs. 45 min. Although the activity of this species was suppressed under DD, one of the four fish showed free-running activity rhythms throughout the experimental period. The length of the free-running period was 23 hrs. 21 min. under DD. Therefore,C. temminckii appeared to have a circadian rhythm. According to field observations,S. gracilis burrows and lies in the sandy bottom whileT. cupido, L. dimidiatus, andC. temminckii hide and rest in spaces among piles of boulders or in crevices of rocks during the night. It seems that the differences in nocturnal behavior among the four species of wrasses mentioned above are closely related to the intensity of endogenous factors in their locomotor activity rhythms.