| Abstract: | In this study we address the question of how much of the covariation among phenotypic characters observed in natural populations is adaptive. We examine covariation among a set of phenotypic characters that describe the wing-melanization pattern of Pieris butterflies. Previous functional analyses of thermoregulatory performance allow us to predict a priori whether and how different wing melanic characters should be correlated. We quantify and analyze the variation in the wing-melanization pattern within species for a series of Pieris populations from relatively cool environments in North America and compare these results with the predictions based on our adaptive hypothesis. We consider adaptive covariation both for biogeographic variation among populations and for seasonal polyphenism (phenotypic plasticity) within populations. Our hypothesis correctly predicts many of the qualitative features of covariation in melanization among major regions of the wings, at the level of biogeographic variation among populations, for both males and females of Pieris occidentalis. When within-population variation is considered, agreement with the adaptive predictions varies considerably in different populations for both P. occidentalis and P. napi males and females. Agreement for P. napi, particularly the females, is generally poorer than for P. occidentalis. In both species, there is a consistent difference in melanization pattern between alpine and arctic sites; this difference is discussed in relation to the differences in the radiative environment between these two types of “cold” habitats. Our results suggest that some important aspects of phenotypic correlation among wing melanic characters in Pieris are adaptive. We emphasize the important distinction between covariation and co-occurrence of characters, and we discuss these results in relation to the extensive biogeographic variation and phenotypic plasticity (seasonal polyphenism) in Pieris wing-melanization patterns. |
