Lethality of chlorine, chlorine dioxide, and a commercial fruit and vegetable sanitizer to vegetative cells and spores of Bacillus cereus and spores of Bacillus thuringiensis

Chlorine, chlorine dioxide (ClO₂), and a commercial raw fruit and vegetable sanitizer (Fit powder) were evaluated for their effectiveness in killing vegetative cells and spores of Bacillus cereus and spores of Bacillus thuringiensis. The ultimate goal was to use one or both species as a potential surrogate(s) for Bacillus anthracis in studies that focus on determining the efficacy of sanitizers in killing the pathogen on food contact surfaces and foods. Treatment with alkaline (pH 10.5–11.0) ClO₂ (200 mg/mL) produced by electrochemical technologies reduced populations of a five-strain mixture of vegetative cells and a five-strain mixture of spores of B. cereus by more than 5.4 and more than 6.4 log cfu/mL, respectively, within 5 min. This finding compares with respective reductions of 4.5 and 1.8 log cfu/mL resulting from treatment with 200 mg/mL chlorine. Treatment with a 1.5% acidified (pH 3.0) solution of Fit powder product was less effective, causing 2.5-log and 0.4-log cfu/mL reductions in the number of B. cereus cells and spores, respectively. Treatment with alkaline ClO₂ (85 mg/mL), acidified (pH 3.4) ClO₂ (85 mg/mL), and a mixture of ClO₂ (85 mg/mL) and Fit powder product (0.5%) (pH 3.5) caused reductions in vegetative cell/spore populations of more than 5.3/5.6, 5.3/5.7, and 5.3/6.0 log cfu/mL, respectively. Treatment of B. cereus and B. thuringiensis spores in a medium (3.4 mg/mL organic and inorganic solids) in which cells had grown and produced spores with an equal volume of alkaline (pH 12.1) ClO₂ (400 mg/mL) for 30 min reduced populations by 4.6 and 5.2 log cfu/mL, respectively, indicating high lethality in the presence of materials other than spores that would potentially react with and neutralize the sporicidal activity of ClO₂.Published by permission of the International Association for Food Protection: Journal of Food Protection (2004) 60:1702–1708This revised version was published online in April 2005 with corrections to the text and the section heading.In section Preparation of treatment solutions the phrase 22-28°C was replaced by 22±2°C.