| Abstract: | The effects of different levels of compensatory payment for vasectomy on sterilization acceptance were examined in 496 vasectomized men in urban Sri Lanka. The results indicate that compensatory payments significantly enhanced the participation of economically poor men in vasectomy programs, especially those who had already achieved a large family size. The proportion of poor acceptors (those with a monthly income of Rs 1000 or less) increased with higher levels of payment; the acceptor's level of education was negatively correlated with the compensation amount, and the mean age of the youngest child was higher among those who received higher payments. 60% of vasectomy acceptors reported using contraception immediately before the vasectomy, suggesting a high level of motivation not to have another child. Respondents cited high effectiveness, no extra expense, and no side effects for their wives as the main reasons for selecting vasectomy over other means of contraception, regardless of the amount of payment received. Only 5% said cash payment was an important reason for choosing vasectomy, and this response did not vary significantly by level of payment. There was no influence of payment level on postoperative complications or satisfaction. While compensatory payments significantly enhanced the participation of poor men in vasectomy programs, they were not effective in attracting poorer men with few children or those whose last child was relatively young. Overall, this study's findings suggest that the decision to provide compensatory payments and how much to provide should be based on economic and political factors, not on the grounds that higher compensatory payments have led to the recruitment of ineligible men or that the promotion of vasectomy has been at the expense of a loss in the quality of services provided. |
