Evaluating the economic damage threshold for bont tick (Amblyomma hebraeum) control in Zimbabwe

Controlling ticks and tick-borne diseases by frequent applications of acaricides (e.g., dipping) is costly, and can leave treated livestock vulnerable to epizootics of tick-borne diseases should the system of applying acaricides break down. The concept of only applying acaricides on an infrequent (strategic) basis often relies on the target tick population displaying a seasonal cycle. However, as adult bont tick (Amblyomma hebraeum) infestations in Zimbabwe's lowveld do not have a strictly seasonal pattern of occurrence, it is recommended that tick control only be applied when bont tick infestations are equal to, or greater than, their economic damage threshold. The economic damage threshold is the minimum average weekly standard female tick burden sufficient to cause damage equal in dollar value to the costs of applying tick control. Assuming that each standard female tick represents a 10 gram weight loss, the economic damage threshold (standard female ticks/week) is equivalent to the ratio of the producer price of beef (liveweight equivalent): per head cost of dipping (Eqn (3)). To illustrate the application of the threshold methodology, it was assumed that the producer price of beef was Z$1.63/kg (U.S.$0.33/kg) and that tick control cost Z$0.29/hd/dip (U.S.$0.06/hd/dip). This gave a threshold of 18 standard female ticks/head/week. Using tick counts obtained from 20 Brahman cattle held at Mbizi in southeastern Zimbabwe, it was shown that for the 1988 calendar year there were only 32 weeks when the economic damage threshold was met or exceeded. This is substantially less that the 44 dippings per year that have been, until very recently, legally required in Zimbabwe. Sensitivity analysis showed that a 10% rise in the cost of dipping reduced to 23 (a 28% decrease) the number of weeks when tick burdens exceeded the economic damage threshold. By further assuming that an acaricide application and residual effects will cause a 3–5 week interval before the next application may be required, the number of weeks when the tick burden was equal to or greater than the threshold of 18 standard females/week fell to just 9–12 weeks. Three factors may cause an alteration in the economic damage threshold: i) tick burdens may cause damage to the udders; ii) secondary infestations (e.g., screw-worm) may cause economic damage; and iii) nutritional stress of the cattle may reduce the actual average per tick weight loss. Until further data becomes available, it is recommended that the economic damage threshold methodology be used as described here, and that farmers closely observe their herds during the suggested weekly tick sampling for udder damage and secondary infestations.