Sexual selection constrains the body mass of male but not female mice |
| |
| Authors: | James S. Ruff Douglas H. Cornwall Linda C. Morrison Joseph W. Cauceglia Adam C. Nelson Shannon M. Gaukler Shawn Meagher Lara S. Carroll Wayne K. Potts |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA;2. Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA;3. Environmental Stewardship Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA;4. Department of Biological Sciences, Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL, USA;5. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Sexual size dimorphism results when female and male body size is influenced differently by natural and sexual selection. Typically, in polygynous species larger male body size is thought to be favored in competition for mates and constraints on maximal body size are due to countervailing natural selection on either sex; however, it has been postulated that sexual selection itself may result in stabilizing selection at an optimal mass. Here we test this hypothesis by retrospectively assessing the influence of body mass, one metric of body size, on the fitness of 113 wild‐derived house mice (Mus musculus) residing within ten replicate semi‐natural enclosures from previous studies conducted by our laboratory. Enclosures possess similar levels of sexual selection, but relaxed natural selection, relative to natural systems. Heavier females produced more offspring, while males of intermediate mass had the highest fitness. Female results suggest that some aspect of natural selection, absent from enclosures, acts to decrease their body mass, while the upper and lower boundaries of male mass are constrained by sexual selection. |
| |
| Keywords: | fecundity intrasexual selection mammals sexual selection sexual size dimorphism stabilizing selection |
|
|
