Effects of various generations of iterative CT reconstruction algorithms on low-contrast detectability as a function of the effective abdominal diameter: A quantitative task-based phantom study

PurposeTo investigate how various generations of iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms impact low-contrast detectability (LCD) in abdominal computed tomography (CT) for different patient effective diameters, using a quantitative task-based approach.MethodsInvestigations were performed using an anthropomorphic abdominal phantom with two optional additional rings to simulate varying patient effective diameters (25, 30, and 35 cm), and containing multiple spherical targets (5, 6, and 8 mm in diameter) with a 20-HU contrast difference. The phantom was scanned using routine abdominal protocols (CTDI_vol, 5.9–16 mGy) on four CT systems from two manufacturers. Images were reconstructed using both filtered back-projection (FBP) and various IR algorithms: ASiR 50%, SAFIRE 3 (both statistical IRs), ASiR-V 50%, ADMIRE 3 (both partial model-based IRs), or Veo (full model-based IR). Section thickness/interval was 2/1 mm or 2.5/1.25 mm, except 0.625/0.625 mm for Veo. We assessed LCD using a channelized Hotelling observer with 10 dense differences of Gaussian channels, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as a figure of merit.ResultsFor the smallest phantom (25-cm diameter) and smallest lesion size (5-mm diameter), AUC for FBP and the various IR algorithms did not significantly differ for any of the tested CT systems. For the largest phantom (35-cm diameter), Veo yielded the highest AUC improvement (8.5%). Statistical and partial model-based IR algorithms did not significantly improve LCD.ConclusionIn abdominal CT, switching from FBP to IR algorithms offers limited possibilities for achieving significant dose reductions while ensuring a constant objective LCD.