首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

贵州观音洞遗址石制品剥片技术辨析
引用本文:李锋,李英华,高星.贵州观音洞遗址石制品剥片技术辨析[J].人类学学报,2020,39(1):1-11.
作者姓名:李锋  李英华  高星
作者单位:中国科学院脊椎动物演化与人类起源重点实验室,中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所,北京100044;中国科学院生物演化与环境卓越创新中心,北京100044;武汉大学历史学院,武汉430072;中国科学院脊椎动物演化与人类起源重点实验室,中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所,北京100044;中国科学院生物演化与环境卓越创新中心,北京100044;中国科学院大学,北京100049
基金项目:中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(B类)(XDB26000000);国家自然科学基金(41872028和41672024);国家社会科学基金(18BKG003);中国科学院青年创新促进会(2017102)
摘    要:近期,英国杂志《自然》(Nature)发表了对贵州观音洞遗址1964-1973年出土石制品的再研究结果,认为该遗址石制品中存在系统的勒瓦娄哇技术;新的光释光测年显示遗址主文化层距今17-8万年。据此,该文作者认为观音洞遗址的石制品组合代表了东亚最早的勒瓦娄哇技术遗存。本文对观音洞遗址石制品的研究历史、勒瓦娄哇技术研究简史和定义等进行了回顾和梳理,同时对观音洞遗址相关石制品进行了详细观察分析。在此基础上认为,观音洞遗址石制品组合是一个相对简单的石核-石片技术复合体,与之前学者得出的结论一致;不存在勒瓦娄哇技术。最后,本文对宁夏水洞沟、金斯太、通天洞等遗址发现的勒瓦娄哇技术遗存的简要分析表明,目前尚无可靠证据显示中国在距今5万年前出现过勒瓦娄哇技术。

关 键 词:观音洞遗址  勒瓦娄哇技术  石制品  技术分析
收稿时间:2019-08-23

Re-examination of core reduction strategies of the Guanyindong lithic assemblage in Guizhou
LI Feng,LI Yinghua,GAO Xing.Re-examination of core reduction strategies of the Guanyindong lithic assemblage in Guizhou[J].Acta Anthropologica Sinica,2020,39(1):1-11.
Authors:LI Feng  LI Yinghua  GAO Xing
Institution:1.Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 1000442.CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing 1000443.School of History, Wuhan University, Wuhan 4300724.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
Abstract:Hu et al recently published an article in Nature reanalyzing the long-curated lithic assemblage excavated from the Guanyindong site in 1964-1973 in Guizhou Province (South China) and draw an opposite conclusion to the previous studies. They put forward a new viewpoint that the assemblage reflected a late Middle Pleistocene Levallois stone-tool technology on the basis of new dates and was thus the earliest Levallois production in East Asia. In this paper, we briefly reviewed the research history of the Guanyindong assemblages and the Levallois technology. Based upon our own careful examination on a sample of Guanyindong assemblages and the technological definition of the Levallois technique, we find that the previous studies of this assemblage, which concluded that it fell within a core-flake technocomplex, remains the most reliable interpretation. We also synthesize the evidence of Levallois technologies in China, such as Shuidonggou, Jinsitai and Tongtiandong sites, and conclude that there is as yet no evidence supporting the occurrence of Levallois technology in China about 50,000 years ago.
Keywords:Guanyindong site  Levallois technology  Lithic artifact  Technological reading  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《人类学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《人类学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号