Visualization of drug--nucleic acid interactions at atomic resolution. V. Structure of two aminoacridine--dinucleoside monophosphate crystalline complexes, proflavine--5-iodocytidylyl (3'-5') guanosine and acridine orange--5-iodocytidylyl (3'-5') guanosine

Acridine orange and proflavine form complexes with the dinucleoside monophosphate, 5-iodocytidylyl(3′–5′)guanosine. The acridine orange-iodoCpG² crystals are monoclinic, space group P2₁, with unit cell dimensions $\text{a = 14.36}\text{A}\text{?}\text{, b = 19.64}\text{A}\text{?}\text{, c = 20.67}\text{A}\text{?}$, β = 102.5 °. The proflavine-iodoCpG crystals are monoclinic, space group C2, with unit cell dimensions $\text{a = 32.14}\text{A}\text{?}\text{, b = 22.23}\text{A}\text{?}\text{, c = 18.42}\text{A}\text{?}$, β = 123.3 °. Both structures have been solved to atomic resolution by Patterson and Fourier methods, and refined by full matrix least-squares.Acridine orange forms an intercalative structure with iodoCpG in much the same manner as ethidium, ellipticine and 3,5,6,8-tetramethyl-N-methyl phenanthrolinium (Jain et al., 1977, Jain et al., 1979), except that the acridine nucleus lies asymmetrically in the intercalation site. This asymmetric intercalation is accompanied by a sliding of base-pairs upon the acridine nucleus and is similar to that observed with the 9-aminoacridine-iodoCpG asymmetric intercalative binding mode described in the previous papers (Sakore et al., 1977, Sakore et al., 1979). Basepairs above and below the drug are separated by about 6.8 Å and are twisted about 10 °; this reflects the mixed sugar puckering pattern observed in the sugar-phospate chains: C3′ endo (3′–5′) C2′ endo (i.e. each cytidine residue has a C3′ endo sugar comformation, while each guanosine residue has a C2′ endo sugar conformation), alterations in glycosidic torsional angles and other small but significant conformational changes in the sugar-phosphate backbone.Proflavine, on the other hand, demonstrates symmetric intercalation with iodoCpG. Hydrogen bonds connect amino groups on proflavine with phosphate oxygen atoms on the dinucleotide. In contrast to the acridine orange structure, base-pairs above and below the intercalative proflavine molecule are twisted about 36 °. The altered magnitude of this angular twist reflects the sugar puckering pattern that is observed: C3′ endo (3′–5′) C3′ endo. Since proflavine is known to unwind DNA in much the same manner as ethidium and acridine orange (Waring, 1970), one cannot use the information from this model system to understand how proflavine binds to DNA (it is possible, for example, that hydrogen bonding observed between proflavine and iodoCpG alters the intercalative geometry in this model system).Instead, we propose a model for proflavine-DNA binding in which proflavine lies asymmetrically in the intercalation site (characterized by the C3′ endo (3′–5′) C2′ endo mixed sugar puckering pattern) and forms only one hydrogen bond to a neighboring phosphate oxygen atom. Our model for proflavine-DNA binding, therefore, is very similar to our acridine orange-DNA binding model. We will describe these models in detail in this paper.