Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica Are Protected against Acetic Acid,but Not Hydrochloric Acid,by Hypertonicity

Chapman et al. (B. Chapman, N. Jensen, T Ross, and M. B. Cole, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:5165-5172, 2006) demonstrated that an increased NaCl concentration prolongs survival of Escherichia coli O157 SERL 2 in a broth model simulating the aqueous phase of a food dressing or sauce containing acetic acid. We examined the responses of five other E. coli strains and four Salmonella enterica strains to increasing concentrations of NaCl under conditions of lethal acidity and observed that the average “lag” time prior to inactivation decreases in the presence of hydrochloric acid but not in the presence of acetic acid. For E. coli in the presence of acetic acid, the lag time increased with increasing NaCl concentrations up to 2 to 4% at pH 4.0, up to 4 to 6% at pH 3.8, and up to 4 to 7% (wt/wt of water) NaCl at pH 3.6. Salmonella was inactivated more rapidly by combined acetic acid and NaCl stresses than E. coli, but increasing NaCl concentrations still decreased the lag time prior to inactivation in the presence of acetic acid; at pH 4.0 up to 1 to 4% NaCl was protective, and at pH 3.8 up to 1 to 2% NaCl delayed the onset of inactivation. Sublethal injury kinetics suggest that this complex response is a balance between the lethal effects of acetic acid, against which NaCl is apparently protective, and the lethal effects of the NaCl itself. Compared against 3% NaCl, 10% (wt/wt of water) sucrose with 0.5% NaCl (which has similar osmotic potential) was found to be equally protective against adverse acetic acid conditions. We propose that hypertonicity may directly affect the rate of diffusion of acetic acid into cells and hence cell survival.We previously observed that inactivation of Escherichia coli O157 SERL 2 by acetic acid at adverse pH in a broth model simulating the aqueous phase of acidic sauces and dressings was reduced by the presence of NaCl (4). Specifically, the time to a 3-log₁₀-unit reduction (t_3D) of E. coli SERL 2 as function of NaCl concentration was significantly nonmonotonic; that is, the t_3D initially increased when NaCl was increased (from 1 to 3% wt/wt] of solution), but the t_3D decreased upon a further increase in NaCl concentration (to 8% wt/wt] of solution) (4). The statistical significance of this “nonmonotonic” response increased with increasing exposure time from 24 to 72 h (at 23°C), primarily due to a proportionally greater increase in inactivation at 1% (wt/wt) NaCl with increasing treatment time than that which was observed at higher NaCl concentrations (4).The combination of acid and NaCl is a common example of the food industry''s “hurdle” approach, which is used to preserve a large and diverse range of foods, including acidic dressings and sauces, fermented meats, cheeses, and preserved vegetables. Given the widespread use of this hurdle combination in food manufacturing, the first aim of this study was to determine whether the observed protection of E. coli SERL 2 from acid inactivation by NaCl is common among E. coli and Salmonella enterica and at what NaCl concentration maximum protection is achieved. A second aim was to determine whether NaCl protection is specific against acid pH in general or against acetic acid in particular. Third, possible protection against acid inactivation by another osmolyte, sucrose, was assessed to resolve whether the effect is solute specific.When cells are placed in hypertonic environments, plasmolysis occurs as the cytoplasmic volume reduces due to water loss by osmosis. The thin peptidoglycan layer of gram-negative microorganisms is anchored to the cytoplasmic membrane and can be distended by plasmolysis or even ruptured when plasmolysis is more extreme. Decad and Nikaido (5) observed that the cytoplasmic volume in gram-negative microorganisms was reduced to ∼50% at ∼0.3 M NaCl but that the plasmolysis-induced cell wall damage was minimal. At 0.5 M (2.9%, wt/wt) NaCl, however, they observed cell wall damage in a large fraction of cells. Thus, in the experiments described here we explored the mechanism of the protective effect of NaCl, and specifically cell wall damage in E. coli populations simultaneously exposed to NaCl and either acetic or hydrochloric acid (HCl), by enumeration of both injured and noninjured survivors by culture on media with and without bile salts.