Diagnostic Efficacy of Cell Block Immunohistochemistry,Smear Cytology,and Liquid-Based Cytology in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Lesions: A Single-Institution Experience |
| |
Authors: | Shan-yu Qin You Zhou Ping Li Hai-xing Jiang |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, PR China.; 2. Minerva Foundation Institute for Medical Research, Helsinki, Finland.; 3. Department of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, PR China.; University of Utah School of Medicine, United States of America, |
| |
Abstract: | BackgroundThe diagnostic efficiency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology varies widely depending on the treatment method of the specimens. The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of cell block (CB) immunohistochemistry, smear cytology (SC), and liquid-based cytology (LBC) in patients with pancreatic lesions without consulting an on-site cytopathologist.MethodsThis study prospectively enrolled 72 patients with pancreatic lesions. The EUS-FNA specimens were examined by SC, LBC, and CB immunohistochemistry. The diagnostic efficacy of the 3 methods was then compared. Patients’ final diagnosis was confirmed by surgical resection specimens, diagnostic imaging, and clinical follow-up.ResultsOur results included 60 malignant and 12 benign pancreatic lesions. The diagnostic sensitivity (90%), negative predictive value (66.7%), and accuracy (91.7%) of CB immunohistochemistry were significantly higher than those of SC (70.0%, 30.0%, and 75.0%, respectively) and LBC (73.3%, 31.6%, and 77.8%, respectively) (all P<0.05). The combination of CB and SC, or CB and LBC, did not significantly increase the efficacy compared to CB immunohistochemistry alone.ConclusionOur findings suggest that in the absence of an on-site cytopathologist, CB immunohistochemistry on EUS-FNA specimens offers a higher diagnostic efficacy in patients with pancreatic lesions than does SC and LBC. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|