首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


An improved phycobilin extraction method
Affiliation:1. Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Viet Nam;2. Faculty of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Viet Nam;3. Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences WULS-SGGW, Poland;4. Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, Istanbul, Turkey;5. Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Food Engineering Department, Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, Halkali, 34303, Istanbul, Turkey;6. Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Food Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, 34469 Istanbul, Turkey;7. Food Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Uşak Üniversitesi, 1 Eylül Kampüsü, 64200 Uşak, Turkey;8. Department of Food Materials and Process Design Engineering, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
Abstract:One unique feature in cyanoprokaryotes, rhodophytes, and cryptophytes is the presence of phycobilin pigments-these water soluble pigments can absorb red, orange, yellow, and green light enhancing the spectral range available for cellular conversion to chemical energy. The presence of phycobilin pigment complexes can be detected using fluorescence, or absorbance measures. Efficient detection of these compounds is essential for use in calibrating absorbance in remote sensing or in physiological studies. The standard procedure for phycobilin analysis involves sonication, extraction in buffer potentially coupled with additional digestion steps using enzymes, repeated freeze and thawing cycles, followed by filtration, and spectrophotometric analyses. An alternative method, using asolectin-CHAPS ((3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]propanesulfonic acid – AC)) solution for extraction, and three cycles of freeze/thawing/sonication, was compared to the phosphate buffer (PB) standard procedure. Cultures of both coccoid and filamentous cyanoprokaryota had improved extraction efficiency (38–80%) using AC. After two complete extractions, no pigment was detectable in AC and near baseline fluorescence was observed in the cell pellet, whereas the PB extraction method removed <90% of the phycobilins after two extractions. Phycocyanin concentration measured by AC extraction was better correlated to lipophilic pigment concentration than using phosphate buffer extraction. AC buffered to pH 6.7 was more effective than AC 3.75. One potential source of experimental error was determined to be the use of a baseline correction for the extraction buffer, not the sample.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号