首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


A two-step strategy for identification of plasma protein biomarkers for endometrial and ovarian cancer
Authors:Stefan Enroth  Malin Berggrund  Maria Lycke  Martin Lundberg  Erika Assarsson  Matts Olovsson  Karin Stålberg  Karin Sundfeldt  Ulf Gyllensten
Institution:1.Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Biomedical Center, Science for Life Laboratory (SciLifeLab) Uppsala,Uppsala University,Uppsala,Sweden;2.OLINK Proteomics,Uppsala,Sweden;3.Department of Women’s and Children’s Health,Uppsala University,Uppsala,Sweden;4.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences,Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University,Gothenburg,Sweden
Abstract:

Background

Over 500,000 women worldwide are diagnosed with ovarian or endometrial cancer each year. We have used a two-step strategy to identify plasma proteins that could be used to improve the diagnosis of women with an indication of gynecologic tumor and in population screening.

Methods

In the discovery step we screened 441 proteins in plasma using the proximity extension assay (PEA) and five Olink Multiplex assays (CVD II, CVD III, INF I, ONC II, NEU I) in women with ovarian cancer (n?=?106), endometrial cancer (n?=?74), benign ovarian tumors (n?=?150) and healthy population controls (n?=?399). Based on the discovery analyses a set of 27 proteins were selected and two focused multiplex PEA assays were developed. In a replication step the focused assays were used to study an independent set of cases with ovarian cancer (n?=?280), endometrial cancer (n?=?228), women with benign ovarian tumors (n?=?76) and healthy controls (n?=?57).

Results

In the discovery step, 27 proteins that showed an association to cancer status were identified. In the replication analyses, the focused assays distinguished benign tumors from ovarian cancer stage III–IV with a sensitivity of 0.88 and specificity of 0.92 (AUC?=?0.92). The assays had a significantly higher AUC for distinguishing benign tumors from late stage ovarian cancer than using CA125 and HE4 (p?=?9.56e?22). Also, population controls could be distinguished from ovarian cancer stage III–IV with a sensitivity of 0.85 and a specificity of 0.92 (AUC?=?0.89).

Conclusion

The PEA assays represent useful tools for identification of new biomarkers for gynecologic cancers. The selected protein assays could be used to distinguish benign tumors from ovarian and endometrial cancer in women diagnosed with an unknown suspicious pelvic mass. The panels could also be used in population screening, for identification of women in need of specialized gynecologic transvaginal ultrasound examination.

Funding

The Swedish Cancer Foundation, Vinnova (SWELIFE), The Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF), Assar Gabrielsson Foundation.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号