Comparison of the Schwartz and CKD-EPI Equations for Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate in Children,Adolescents, and Adults: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Background

Estimating kidney glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is of utmost importance in many clinical conditions. However, very few studies have evaluated the performance of GFR estimating equations over all ages and degrees of kidney impairment. We evaluated the reliability of two major equations for GFR estimation, the CKD-EPI and Schwartz equations, with urinary clearance of inulin as gold standard.

Methods and Findings

The study included 10,610 participants referred to the Renal and Metabolic Function Exploration Unit of Edouard Herriot Hospital (Lyon, France). GFR was measured by urinary inulin clearance (only first measurement kept for analysis) then estimated with isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS)–traceable CKD-EPI and Schwartz equations. The participants’ ages ranged from 3 to 90 y, and the measured GFRs from 3 to 160 ml/min/1.73 m². A linear mixed-effects model was used to model the bias (mean ratio of estimated GFR to measured GFR). Equation reliability was also assessed using precision (interquartile range IQR] of the ratio) and accuracy (percentage of estimated GFRs within the 10% P10] and 30% P30] limits above and below the measured GFR). In the whole sample, the mean ratio with the CKD-EPI equation was significantly higher than that with the Schwartz equation (1.17 95% CI 1.16; 1.18] versus 1.08 95% CI 1.07; 1.09], p < 0.001, t-test). At GFR values of 60–89 ml/min/1.73 m², the mean ratios with the Schwartz equation were closer to 1 than the mean ratios with the CKD-EPI equation whatever the age class (1.02 95% CI 1.01; 1.03] versus 1.15 95% CI 1.13; 1.16], p < 0.001, t-test). In young adults (18–40 y), the Schwartz equation had a better precision and was also more accurate than the CKD-EPI equation at GFR values under 60 ml/min/1.73 m² (IQR: 0.32 95% CI 0.28; 0.33] versus 0.40 95% CI 0.36; 0.44]; P30: 81.4 95% CI 78.1; 84.7] versus 63.8 95% CI 59.7; 68.0]) and also at GFR values of 60–89 ml/min/1.73 m². In all patients aged ≥65 y, the CKD-EPI equation performed better than the Schwartz equation (IQR: 0.33 95% CI 0.31; 0.34] versus 0.40 95% CI 0.38; 0.41]; P30: 77.6 95% CI 75.7; 79.5] versus 67.5 95% CI 65.4; 69.7], respectively). In children and adolescents (2–17 y), the Schwartz equation was superior to the CKD-EPI equation (IQR: 0.23 95% CI 0.21; 0.24] versus 0.33 95% CI 0.31; 0.34]; P30: 88.6 95% CI 86.7; 90.4] versus 29.4 95% CI 26.8; 32.0]). This study is limited by its retrospective design, single-center setting with few non-white patients, and small number of patients with severe chronic kidney disease.

Conclusions

The results from this study suggest that the Schwartz equation may be more reliable than the CKD-EPI equation for estimating GFR in children and adolescents and in adults with mild to moderate kidney impairment up to age 40 y.