The importance of combining air sampling and surface analysis when studying problematic houses for mold biodiversity determination

Houses that underwent water damages are often responsible for heath problems of the occupants. Since there is no universally used protocol for the analysis, we wanted to verify the usefulness of surface sampling versus air sampling for the evaluation of mold diversity in problematic houses and the value of the number of visible mold growth zones to predict air quality. Seventeen houses were sampled for culturable molds in the air and on the surfaces showing contamination. We compared the mold taxa found in the air and on the surfaces and verified the correlation between the number of moldy surfaces and airbone mold concentration. This study demonstrated that, surprisingly, some of the so called wet spore molds (e.g. Stachybotrys) were found more often from air than surface samples whereas, some dry spore molds (e.g. Asp. fumigatus) was more easily isolated from surface samples. There was a good correlation between the number of visible mold growth zones and the concentration of airborne molds. We conclude that air and surface sampling are necessary to evaluate mold diversity in problematic houses and that the number of mold growth zones is a good predictor of airborne mold concentration.