Isolation and characterization of a cutinase from Fusarium roseum culmorum and its immunological comparison with cutinases from F. solani pisi.

Fusarium roseum culmorum, grown on apple cutin as the sole source of carbon, was shown to produce a cutin depolymerizing enzyme. From the extracellular fluid of these F. roseum cultures, a cutinase and a nonspecific esterase were isolated utilizing Sephadex G-100, QAE-Sephadex, and SP-Sephadex chromatography. The homogeneity of the cutinase was verified by polyacrylamide disc gel electrophoresis. The molecular weight of the cutinase was estimated to be 24,300 by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate. Electrophoretic mobility of this enzyme was between that of Cutinases I and II from Fusarium solani pisi. The F. roseum cutinase hydrolyzed p-nitrophenyl butyrate and cutin, but not p-nitrophenyl palmitate, while the nonspecific esterase hydrolyzed the long-chain esters. Amino acid composition of F. roseum cutinase was found to be similar to that of F. solani pisi Cutinase I except for differences in the number of serine, valine, and cysteine residues. The time-course, protein concentration dependence, substrate concentration dependence, and pH optimum (10.0 for cutin hydrolysis) of the F. roseum cutinase was similar to the cutinases from F. solani pisi. The F. roseum cutinase was inhibited by diisopropylfluorophosphate and paraoxon, and the [³H]diisopropylphosphate group was covalently attached to the enzyme upon treatment with tritiated diisopropylfluorophosphate. Therefore, it is concluded that catalysis by cutinase involves an “active serine.” Immunochemical studies with a rabbit antibody prepared against F. solani pisi Cutinase I demonstrated that Cutinase II from this organism was immunologically very similar to, but not identical to, Cutinase I. On the other hand, the cutinase from F. roseum was immunologically quite different from the cutinases isolated from F. solani pisi in that it did not cross-react with anticutinase I. However, all three cutinases were virtually identical in their sensitivity to inhibition by anticutinase I, and all three enzymes were virtually completely inhibited by the anticutinase I.