Increased taxon and character sampling reveals novel intergeneric relationships in the Cracidae (Aves: Galliformes) |
| |
Authors: | K. Frank-Hoeflich,L. F. Silveira,,J. Estudillo-Ló pez,A. M. Garcí a-Koch,L. Ongay-Larios, D. Piñ ero |
| |
Affiliation: | Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM, México D.F., México;;Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;;Granja 'La Siberia', Vida Silvestre A.C. Av. Acozac s/n Ixtapaluca, Edo. de México, México;;Unidad de Biología Molecular, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, UNAM, México D.F., México |
| |
Abstract: | The Cracidae is one of the most endangered bird families in the World. Several studies have been published recently on the evolution and conservation of cracids. Phylogenetic analyses using a fragment of 661 bp of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene for 39 different species of cracids corroborated most relationships found in previous studies. The present work attempts to refine the former phylogenetic hypothesis by increasing taxon sampling and combining molecular with osteological, integumentary and behavioural characters using Maximum Parsimony (MP) and Bayesian analyses. We present both separate and combined total evidence analyses with our molecular data, 152 osteological and 74 integumentary + behavioural characters. While supporting most aspects of the molecular-based hypotheses, the tree based on the combined matrix suggests several modifications of the generic composition for each of the two subfamilies: Penelopinae and Cracinae, and supports the merging of the genera Pipile with Aburria and Mitu with Pauxi . These results suggest that increased taxon and character sampling from a diversity of sources may be at least as important as increased sampling of only one type. Besides, of a total of 891 characters we had 437 parsimony-informative sites (almost half of the analyzable sites) proving the efficiency of a total-evidence approach. |
| |
Keywords: | Cracidae taxon sampling cytochrome b morphology behaviour phylogeny |
|
|