Genomic selection prediction models comparing sequence capture and SNP array genotyping methods

The successful application of genomic selection (GS) approaches is dependent on genetic makers derived from high-throughput and low-cost genotyping methods. Recent GS studies in trees have predominantly relied on SNP arrays as the source of genotyping, though this technology has a high entry cost. The recent development of alternative genotyping platforms, tailored to specific species and with low entry cost, has become possible due to advances in next-generation sequencing and genome complexity reduction methods such as sequence capture. However, the performance of these new platforms in GS models has not yet been evaluated, or compared to models developed from SNP arrays. Here, we evaluate the impact of these genotyping technologies on the development of GS prediction models for a Eucalyptus breeding population composed of 739 trees phenotyped for 13 wood quality and growth traits. Genotyping data obtained with both methods were compared for linkage disequilibrium, minor allele frequency, and missing data. Phenotypic prediction methods RR-BLUP and BayesB were employed, while predictive ability using cross validation was used to evaluate the performance of GS models derived from the different genotyping platforms. Differences in linkage disequilibrium patterns, minor allele frequency, missing data, and marker distribution were detected between sequence capture and SNP arrays. However, RR-BLUP and BayesB GS models resulted in similar predictive abilities. These results demonstrate that both genotyping methods are equivalent for genomic prediction of the traits evaluated. Sequence capture offers an alternative for species where SNP arrays are not available, or for when the initial development cost is too high.