Mitosis with undivided chromosomes

Summary Cases of cell division with single chromatids are discussed in connection with a study on mitosis with undivided chromosomes made on living material of the endosperm of Haemanthus katharinae. Such divisions are known from certain abnormal mitoses in the microspores of a few plant species, and also from the second meiotic division, in which it is possible in numerous materials to study the behaviour of daughter univalents, and, in a few cases, also daughter chromosomes derived from chromosomes that were paired during the first division.The various cases of mitosis with single chromatids show a great variation with respect to the degree of scattering of the chromosomes over the spindle at metaphase. In a few cases there is practically no tendency to form a metaphase plate. In other cases the tendency to form such a plate is more or less pronounced, but also in these cases it is difficult for the chromosomes to form this arrangement. Some of them remain scattered over the spindle. After the metaphase a kind of anaphase usually follows in which the single chromatids, without division, move to the poles, often with other chromosomes lagging in intermediate positions.An approach of chromosomes to the poles may be caused by two different mechanisms in mitoses of this kind and only in a few cases is the information sufficient to show that active centromere movements occur during these anaphases.In many aspects of their behaviour on the spindle, single chromatids are similar to ordinary univalents of the first meiotic division. For this reason the movement mechanics of the chromosomes of the first meiotic division is briefly reviewed.The interpretation is expressed that the structure of the centromere region of a single chromatid shows some similarity to that of a univalent of the first meiotic division and that this may be the reason for their similar behaviour. The chromatid centromere would have a structural multiplicity with respect to its kinetic elements, corresponding to its subdivision in half-chromatids and also to the presence of two or three consecutive chromomeres in its longitudinal direction. As these kinetic elements are arranged close to one another on one side of the narrow cylinder of the centromere constriction, it is difficult for them to orient, towards both poles simultaneously. A single chromatid having a centromere of this kind will show orientation instability and change its orientation between the two unipolar orientations and various more or less bipolar orientations. The movements following these different orientations would cause the scattering of these single chromatids over the spindle. The orientation of ordinary mitotic metaphase chromosomes, consisting of two such chromatids, could often be the consequence of a process of co-orientation similar to that in meiotic bivalents.The anaphase movement of undivided chromosomes, which by active centromere movements are shifted in the polar directions without a separation of daughter components, is discussed with reference to a similar behaviour observed by Dietz in multivalents in Ostracods. These multivalents are stabilized in the equator during metaphase, in spite of the fact that they have two or three centromeres directed towards one pole and a single one towards the other. During anaphase their chromosomes do not separate but the whole configurations are shifted towards that pole towards which the majority of the centromeres are directed (this is followed by another type of movement which does not concern us in this connection). Undivided chromosomes that are oriented with more of their kinetic material towards one of the poles and less towards the other should by the same mechanisms as moved the multivalents be shifted in the equatorial direction during metaphase and in the polar direction during anaphase. The mechanism of these events is obscure. A change in the interpretation given by Dietz is suggested.This paper is dedicated to Professor Franz Schrader on the occasion of his seventieth birthday.